Net neutrality debate is expected to be completely satisfied with the outcome
The Federal Communications Commission is set to finally vote on rules this month that will keep the Internet open, but the fight may continue as neither side in the Net neutrality debate is expected to be completely satisfied with the outcome.
As expected, early Wednesday, the FCC staff circulated an agenda for the agency’s December 21 meeting stating that it would be voting on an order that adopts “basic rulesThomas Sabo Ketteof the road to preserve the open Internet as a platform for innovation, investment, competition, and free expression.”
Chairman Julius Genachowski gave a preview of the new rules during a brief press Wednesday. Genachowski
In that proposal the chairman suggested making the four basic principles already outlined by the commission official rules and he suggested adding two rules.
Major telephone companies and cable operators, which have generally been opposed to Net neutrality regulations, supported most of the original proposal. But there were two major areas of contention. For one, broadband providers wanted to ensure that the language used in the rules would not prohibit them from either managing their networks or charging different prices for different levels of service. And second, wireless service providers wanted the wireless networks to be exempt from Net neutrality regulations.
Genachowski said during his speech that the proposal will allow broadband providers to impose usage-based charges so that customers using more bandwidth would get charged more than customers using less. The FCC will also allow providers to experiment with offering specialized services that could provide higher-quality access to consumers rather than sending applications and content over the public Internet.
Broadband providers will also be required to justify why these services require dedicated bandwidth rather than being delivered over the public Internet. And broadband companies cannot discriminate against traffic on the public Internet in favor of their own services or their customers’ premium services.
The new proposal will also treat wireless networks differently than wired networks with respect to Net neutrality. Wired broadband providers will be “prohibited http://www.thomassabode.netfrom blocking lawful content, applications, services and the connection of nonharmful devices to the network,” and they will be subject to transparency requirements as to how their networks are managed.
Wireless service providers will also be subject to the transparency requirement. And they will also not be able to block or degrade most traffic, such as Web sites and certain applications. But Genachowski said he recognizes “differences between fixed and mobile broadband,” and therefore believes the rules should be more flexible for wireless.
The new proposal is not likely to satisfy either side in the debate. Broadband providers are likely to still find some of the provisions too restrictive. Some companies have suggested that Congress should wr
Processing your request, Please wait....
