Trademark Law and Internet law

Must i register my individual name like a federal trademark?

The unequivocal answer for celebrities, sports figures, published authors, speakers and individuals marketing goods and services under their individual names is, “Yes.”

A registration allows clients and counsel to do something quickly to prevent unauthorized use of individual names for marketing of competitive goods and services, a practice that is exploding on the net. Just as major corporations set up a “poison pill” in order to avoid uninvited control attempts by competitors, individuals with trademark rights in individual names are able to use a trademark registration to serve a similar purpose.

There are two major why you should register an individual’s name as being a trademark.

1. Provides entry to speedy and less costly remedies afforded to trademark owners whose marks are contained in unauthorized domain names; and

2. Creates a poison pill against competitors purchasing marks as search phrases and who use marks in Metadata.

The “right of publicity” is really a legal doctrine employed to prevent unauthorized use of someone’s name, image, or likeness for commercial purposes. Entry to remedies for such violations remains tied to traditional, more expensive court proceedings. Moreover, the U.S. anti cyber squatting statute, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1129, offers relief for theft of unregistered individual names only upon proof the registration appeared having an intent to trade the name for a return, and control competitive uses, which are far more common.

California Business & Professions Code § 17525 is the one other alternative that affords protection for names of deceased celebrities. It eliminates your need that registration be manufactured by having an intent to extort money. That’s fine and dandy, but wait , how do California residents sue a cyber squatter situated in Korea, over which there is no jurisdiction, i.e. the court doesn’t have any authority to bind the party to its decision?

How Does a Federal Trademark Benefit the Individual?

A review of the most typical types of brandjacking offers the answer.

Unauthorized Utilization of your Name in a Domain name. How are you affected when ones own name ends up in the URL of a site owned and utilized by a 3rd party? There are 2 possible remedies.

Uniform Domain Dispute Resolution (“UDRP”). The arbitration could possibly be filed prior to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) a treadmill of several other approved ICANN dispute forums. A decision is manufactured within 8 weeks of appointment in the arbitrator. Costs are substantially just one court proceeding since all proceedings are in writing.

One must prove three elements to secure return from the domain:

o The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly much like a trademark or service mark that Complainant has right; and

o The registrant doesn’t have legitimate rights within the mark; and

o Registration is made in bad faith.

The initial element is made by providing a legitimate trademark registration. A federal registration proves the 1st element without requirement of further proof trademark use.

Contrast the actual result where there isn’t any registration as well as the individual, albeit well known, loses.

David Pecker v. Mr. Ferris, WIPO Case No. D2006-1514. David Pecker, CEO of yank Media, was unsuccessful in proving that they had “used his personal reputation for the objective of advertising or promoting his business and the sale associated with a goods or services.” Joacim Bruus-Jensen v. John Adamsen, WIPO Case No. D2004-0458.

Anna Nicole Smith c/o CMG Worldwide v. DNS Research, Inc., NAF Case FAO 0220007

“[T]the mere fact of experiencing an excellent career as an actress, singer or TV program star does not provide exclusive rights on the usage of a reputation within the trademark laws. The events have to have a clear showing of high commercial value and significant recognition from the name as solely those of the performer.”

Anti Cyber squatting Statute. The U.S. Trademark statute, Lanham Act § 43(d)(2) provides the U.S. District court for the Eastern District of Virginia can be obtained to launch against offenders globally holding domains which has an U.S. registry. This remedy is predicated upon in rem jurisdiction, an time tested doctrine that allows a court to exercise jurisdiction based on the location of the property, and lives in settling property boundary and ownership issues, including notice to lost or unknown heirs. When it comes to websites, use of the § 43(d) anti-cyber squatting provisions can be acquired as long as the plaintiff’s mark is federally registered while using U.S. Trademark Office.

The 1st me is clearly not objectionable. But weight loss people invest in the descriptive term, the cost climbs up making its use cost prohibitive. Competitors start to search for cheaper ways to get their message out using other terms, such as trademarks and individual’s names associated with related products.

Courts have already ruled a competitor purchasing the mark, or locating a mark in metadata to secure website positioning is liable for infringement beneath the concept of “initial interest confusion.” The controversial topic practice by Google of auctioning trademarks to competitors for sponsored listings could be the subjection of pending lawsuits. Google has been turning a deaf ear, leaving the client to pursue only the direct infringer. Listed here are two examples:

A noted author’s name will be purchased by the competitor to promote a third party’s books and seminars. The author as well as the publisher must pay Google more for utilizing their own names to advertise on account of competitive bidding by infringers!

A trendy discount filing service for trademarks markets its services on the web by ordering trademarks belonging to others. Our recent Google search of “XEROX trademark” arrived a sponsored ad by Legal Zoom, and that is purchasing the mark XEROX® as being a key word advertising its trademark registration services! Exactly what is the concern?

o The competitor is relying upon the nice will existing in another woman’s name to promote their product, thus gaining a free of charge ride to draw customers to their competitive product.

o The terms are bid upon over the Google auction process, forcing mcdougal as well as the publisher of the books to bid against others to make use of the author’s name! Your competition drives the bid price charged to an individual using his or her own name in promoting their unique services, increasing Google’s profits and providing the trademark owner’s competitor with a platform.

Next occasion you start a Google search, note rankings for products which pop-up in the rankings apart from for your one you keyed in. Some competitors are routinely including better known competitor’s marks within their metadata to gain ranking if the trademarked term is searched. It is deemed an example of infringement by using initial interest confusion which is illegal.

In sum, look at a federal trademark registration for goods and services sold and promoted under an individual’s name as a poison pill for cybersquatters. Major corporations drive them to prevent unfriendly takeover attempts. Individuals must do exactly the same regarding unfriendly theft of domains. On the net Age, in all probability you’ll be glad in college.

If you are in need of filing for a trademark on the internet, or need an affiliate marketing lawyer
then contact a intellectual property lawyer today.

Processing your request, Please wait....

Leave a Reply