Thomas Jefferson And Andrew Jackson

Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were strong personalities and national leaders who changed the course of American history and elations between different social classes. Both of these men were Presidents of the USA and had to survive in difficult circumstances. The main similarity between these Presidents and their policy is a removal of Native Americans and separation of native tribes from the rest of American society. Thesis Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson provided very effective economic, social and political reforms which helped them to develop the American nation but were against native tribes introducing the policy of removal and isolation.
Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were effective political leaders who were able to transform the nation and create a strong social structure. In case of effective leadership, the conceptualization of intelligence moved from a trait to a process. These approaches to intelligence held great promise for illuminating the bases of successful political leadership o that time (Wheeler, 114). Example of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson show that cognitive skills and knowledge interact with environmental demands in a mutual. A central process in effective adaptation is the turning the novel and unfamiliar into the predictable and routine, which can then be managed for attaining desired goals. Thomas Jefferson was one who could muster current social and economic problems and ability to relate to the problem environment in a flexible way that allows for the acquisition of new skills and knowledge that help the individual to develop the solutions necessary for goal attainment. Andrew Jackson used high socialized power motives and unique vision that attracts followers, political power and personal power (Wheeler, 121This involved the establishment of the credibility and legitimacy of authority by matching subordinate prototype-based expectations for leadership (Hollitz 221).
Both Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson approved the removal of Native Indians and their isolation. Thomas Jefferson made little attempt to see each event beyond its immediate context or to make connections between the various experiences. It is this process of confrontation, the result of an interaction between a certain kind of environment and, for all his sizes and shapes, a certain kind of individual, which Thomas Jefferson came to see as uniquely alien (Wheeler, 120). Still, in contrast to Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson did only a removal plan while Andrew Jackson developed his ideas and introduced them to Congress. Under Andrew Jackson’s presidency, Indian removal became a law, known as The Indian removal Act. For both leader, the constant trials of oppressive nature of tribes had their effects upon individual western psyches, and the stern settings of the West attracted men of a coarse fibre. The combination of brutish men in a grim setting occasionally led Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson to a conception of the West as a land of random yet constant danger. Both of them supposed that every stranger, in such a land, becomes a potential enemy, every notch and crevice an invitation to suicide. In others, particularly those of the vaqueros of the Southwest, the natural result of constant confrontations with an oppressive environment is a philosophic fatalism. At the same time that Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were applauding the fact that his natural men possessed minds “which lack intellect and social needs (Hollitz 224).
In sum, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson differed in their practical strategies against Native Americans but shared similar ideas on their removal. The logic of the serious side of western life, fraught with actual and potential perils, seemed to dictate that its inhabitants be of a special ilk and adopt a specific stance toward their environment. The “spirit” with which the strong men of the West confront their world is for Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson a descriptive term for the manner with which one comes to terms with the experience.

dissertation testimonials

Processing your request, Please wait....

Leave a Reply