Gu Chujun different life from the Pros to encounter the same problems – Gu Chujun, Kelon – HC network appliance industry-hc360
Pros and
Gu Chujun
In different
Life
Running on two tracks, but today, in one issue, the fate of the two of them appeared in the intersection: the judicial process. The difference is that Pros is a specific face of the judicial process??? Should not be
Mental illness
Identification, and Gu Chujun face is somewhat delicate "public hearing"?? What is the public hearing? With the media? Report materials be made public? As Gu outside the judiciary may also tangle of local, administrative, and capital strength of giant beetles and so on.
From this perspective, claiming that he did not "mentally ill" of Qiu Xinghua than threatened "hunger strike" of Gu Chujun to be lucky?? At least the possibility of his face to the more clearly.
Prison Pros Speaking obscure Southern dialect has told the judge, who told his defense: "I do not have any mental illness." In fact, even if the Pros stressed that he is a mental illness also need to Shaanxi Provincial High Court "for judicial Identification of mental illness. " However, once the Pros were identified as mentally ill, may not be executed, many people believe that this case for the families of the victims is difficult to explain.
But from
Law
Fair point, do not do forensic psychiatry, related to judicial proceedings; law is the impartiality of the parties can only assume that he should bear legal responsibility, it can really defend the dignity of the law.
Qiu murder case later, some experts continue to doubt the mental health Qiu, China He Weifang of five legal experts, Bing, Long Wei ball, HE Hai, Zhou Ze, who together form an open letter, called on relevant judicial case Pros department immediately conducted Qiu Forensic Psychiatry. Five experts in the "open letter" said: "Although psychiatrists have suspected Pros mentally ill, but the judiciary has not been related to mental illness of their identification. We believe that the right to decide whether to identify absolutely give prosecutors The judge, is an extremely dangerous system, because they, like us, are all psychiatric aspects of the layman. "
"Open letter" said the "decision" in the law is "the power to initiate judicial" in China's existing regulations, the applicant's identification is not necessary for identification of activities will make the running, too Identification of activities that is in our power to decide whether or not start in the judiciary. Experts worry that has the absolute right to start this after the event of favoritism, "identification" or "identify" the failure will have a number of mental patients could be sent to the execution ground, or sent to prison, and let the others do not mentally ill have the opportunity to "survived."
If, Qiu Xinghua's "order" focus, there is the possibility to resolve the relative; then Gu Chujun the face of the judicial process more subtle?? In the "media has been allowed to attend," the court, Gu Chujun debate in court said the four charges are not true: false registered capital on his defense at first in order not to violate the Company Law, the local industrial and commercial administration
Management
Departmental approval, take the alternative measures; on accounting fraud, according to his view
Business
Trading patterns, after signing the contract, even if the buyer returned all the goods can not be part of an accounting fraud Moreover, these acts are from Deloitte & Touche to pressure; on the misappropriation of funds, he believes he controlled Grinko Far from defaulting Seoul Kelon's capital, but the company is owed Greencool Kelon 4.78 billion, these funds remain in the company, but not into the hands of individuals, it does not constitute a crime; on the job occupation, he thought of Yangzhou City Yangzhou Greencool Finance Award 40 million yuan, is a government investment incentives, there is no illegal problem.
Which is simply the most explosive was involved in. "Deloitte directed fraud driven" issues, and if said is true, then Deloitte & Touche as auditors for the litigation and will face severe penalties. But what is the truth? Only Gu Chujun and other people really understand the Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu.
Gu Chujun
We are concerned about the case, to some extent is to show that Gu deserve What's wrong, the court should be just the final decision. We hope to see more reflection is Gu Chujun case of other elements: the authorized capital of China's strict system and the reality of the universal contrast, the transnational intermediary if you happen to fulfill their statutory obligations,
Securities
Regulatory authorities to fulfill their regulatory responsibilities, whether at the local government investment against the law to introduce the various concessions and so on.
However, the case involved in. Gu Chujun cover a broad, may also indicate the case "legal environment" more vulnerable to the impact forces from other directions.
[Key words]:
Gu Chujun
Kelon
Comment
Large
In
Small
I am Chinese Manufacturers writer, reports some information about lotus candle holders , moroccan candle lanterns.
Processing your request, Please wait....
