We might as well assumptions
We might as well assumptions: “Chinese poets instinct has grass-roots” this sentence is correct. But, so that the present era in the public psychology common also grass-roots, is wrong. Then think current times characteristics is “naturalness, bottom, on the ground, native traditional”, also wrong. As for mbt shoe contemporary poetry also generally reflected, grass-roots more wrong. Otherwise, the present age difference with the past age? Then poet and ancient poet any different? Then what poetry and ancient poems are different?
Chinese for thousands of years, namely, use the psychological accumulation to reveal “grass-roots” makes sense, but it has the scope is too wide. Literally for example: in thousands of years, under the influence of the feudal autocratic Chinese psychological accumulation has “grass-roots”, this is a more proactive description, but if the negative point, and describe subservient “, this deep “” servitude in today’s era,” don’t be changed? So everybody should see, “the psychological commonness” not only instinct is not suitable for explain poetry era characteristic, also is not suitable for understand poetry artistic innovation.
Instinct what things? Originally refers to animals in special typical of stimuli, rigid, fixed behavior patterns. If from man’s psychological aspect, the person’s instincts behavior not mbt footwear beyond the instinct “and” life “death instinct” range, reflected in the man’s instinct to writing poetry psychological trait, nature also not beyond the scope of birth and death. If the problem is magnified to “poet instinct,” grass-roots than directly say “poet has the birth and death of instinct”, or simply said “poems,” said a human right, because certainly such is the nature of every man, poet is well. But, says this kind of words have he yiyi? In the present age of Chinese poetry, which is just a front there was nothing wrong with empty talk.
Processing your request, Please wait....
