Peng Yang: 7 Q Huiyuan takeover of the "not happy"
Recently, Chinese people do not very happy. Take Huiyuan And Coca-Cola Marriage, the end point is not Coke : 18, the Commerce Department finds that the case of Coca-Cola acquire Huiyuan would adversely affect competition, and banned the acquisition. One time, he stirred up a "Breaking Couples" criticized, saliva everywhere. 22, Commerce Minister Chen Deming said that Coca-Cola to buy Huiyuan in between the two foreign companies, not involved in China's investment policy. Thus, diversification of the people
Family business label, antitrust disputes, trade protectionism, and many other elements in the saliva and controversy, this time, Dayton was embarrassed.
1. Huiyuan with Coca-Cola why not marriage?
Commerce Department explained that for antitrust reasons. Analogy, as "Marriage Law" is also the case against marriage, but can not conclude that the marriage registration department inhumane.
2. National enterprises, the label can become a shield?
National enterprises tag is not important, important is that marriage can not destroy the market with the Coca-Cola fair competition. The defenders of the Ministry of Commerce is the market rules, no matter who participate, the rules must ensure that the market will not be damaged.
3. But why, once the "national brand" is acquired, the Chinese people unhappy?
Can understand people's Hu Du sentiment. As the Chinese point of assets in overseas acquisitions, as local people will also respond. Prior to the acquisition of foreign capital have too much cause some national brand sink Erzhi lessons, but participation in the process of globalization, it is inevitable. The face of China's Huiyuan registration is not reality, just as those who joined the foreign nationality of the Chinese, we always inner complex.
4. Zhu Xinli, Huiyuan boss, "the moment to support enterprises to sell when the pig" wrong?
From a property perspective, Huiyuan are all business owners. Business than the right to decide the fate of entrepreneurs. Therefore, their relatives or friends of other people, so why should end up interfering in "the freedom of marriage" notoriety.
5. Marriage failed, Huiyuan shares Weidun, stranded investment plan, a question was raised: Enterprise rotten in the hands of the correct?
As Huiyuan Idealists, but some concern, "Throughout the domestic and foreign, who have been able to swallow the Huiyuan?" Despite strong drink Coca-Cola Huiyuan, if the threat of monopoly and fair competition, we of course duty-bound to oppose, even to pay the cost of a rotten business. To combat monopoly, Americans showed no mercy, of the last century has personally would own "national enterprise" Rockefeller Standard Oil was split into 34 companies to compel.
6. Why do some people support the anti-monopoly, but ignored the awful marriage may result in monopoly?
Country is still dominated by administrative monopoly, there are very few real market monopoly. More importantly, the awful marriage is only theoretical "monopoly."
7. Laurels almost empty, anti-monopoly also how much effort?
Huiyuan deal with Coca-Cola is the first anti-monopoly law not passed since the implementation of the case. Unfortunately, this was a possible monopoly eventually aborted. We broke off the finger of foot addition was found, such as banking, telecommunications, petroleum, electric power industries false competition or monopoly is also waiting for it to anti-monopoly. In the market environment, regardless of national enterprises, foreign-owned or state-owned enterprises that can not have a monopoly. Between Huiyuan and Coca-Cola
on the attempted marriage, I think, in globalization, acquisitions and the acquisition is inevitable, simply refuse to buy is not the best way to protect national companies. Moreover, the rise of the Chinese economy is increasingly becoming the context of global consensus, when domestic enterprises have begun to go buy, we should accept the reality of way acquisition, the acquisition is not in fact instead of themselves, not self-serving. Only the acquisition must have the prerequisite??? Must not undermine the internal market competition rules of the game. In a normal and orderly market rules, both sold was acquired, it certainly can buy it back. Who can not always just the seller.
I am China Crafts Suppliers writer, reports some information about baby bath ring seat , bathroom magazine holders.
Processing your request, Please wait....
