Does not match with the tag clothing fabric clothing company, "a compensabl
The plug was found to buy a tag and sewing clothes, clothing fabric elements within the logo shown below do not match, Miss Lau, a famous clothing company in negotiations with the results of the case without a lawsuit against the company, require the company to refund 3940 element, and double compensation 3,940 yuan. Yesterday, reporter learned from the city, and one in the hospital, the court has made the final decision on the case, the well-known clothing companies assume "a compensable back a" responsibility.
March 2009, Ms Liu to a well-known clothing company purchased a total of 3,940 yuan wool cardigan girls, girls short sleeve T-shirts and other clothing. Miss Xiang Liu of the company sales vouchers and invoices issued. After Ms. Liu found her to buy a tag and sewing clothes, plug in the clothing fabric elements within the logo shown below is not consistent, then negotiate with the company. Both parties agree that Miss Liu sued the court to require an order to buy the clothes she returned to the company by the company's refund 3,940 yuan and 3,940 yuan double compensation.
, The company will buy the clothes Ms Liu made the identification, appraisal report external tag and clothing fabric clothes do have access, so the companies are unwilling to provide identification of the report as evidence.
Court of first instance held that the plug-in clothing and clothing does not match the actual fabric of the tag, which acts constitute civil fraud, it ruled that the company's commitment to "pay back one of a" responsibility.
The company refused to accept one hospital to sue Shanghai, said Ms Lau and the first instance of the agent, in the past on many occasions with similar means in the courts, so she is not real consumers, and that she purchasing defective goods to the courts to require compensation business, such behavior is "Fake Purchasers", not a real consumer behavior. Miss Liu argues that the legal action was not that she is not a consumer, can not be justified business rhetoric of consumer fraud.
An intermediate court hearing that Miss Lau in the well-known apparel companies for their girls really bought wool cardigan, girls short sleeve T-shirts and other clothing, and these clothes, fabrics and clothing plug the actual tag in the fabric composition and content expressed are not consistent with the fact that has also been examined, so the court to confirm the company's conduct constitutes civil fraud. Miss Liu has brought the number of litigation and the case had no direct relation, once the litigation can not be denied the status of Ms Liu consumers good reason, let alone a business selling goods in the course of the exemption reason for the existence of fraud, so the the company's exemption request, the court not support it. In conclusion, the Court of Final Appeal decision was made above.
I am a professional writer from China Manufacturers, which contains a great deal of information about $keyword_li, welcome to visit!
Processing your request, Please wait....
