Gree case refraction: government procurement not only buy expensive of the norma
In
Guangdong
Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital 1
Air conditioning
Government procurement tenders, the offer 17.07 million yuan in Guangzhou, Gree air-conditioning companies have unexpectedly lost to offer 21.51 million yuan in Guangdong Province
Oil
Chemical industry
Construction Corporation on the grounds that the text wrong because, for the Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance of Guangzhou Geli to court (November 2, "China Youth Daily").
All know, shopping to shop around, as the product is value for money for. In our ordinary people's view, "taken advantage" is absolutely not done, it may Guangzhou Bureau of Finance do not think so, they did pretty comfortable?? More than 400 million of the purchase price, not bad money, do not blink.
We could not understand the procurement with air conditioning, "Petrochemicals building" in the end any relationship, but we do know is that the Gree air-conditioning in the first round evaluation was recommended as the first successful candidate, which has proven its value for money the highest in the bidding companies. "Writing error" Perhaps the reason is strictly procedural, but this is not as strict in practice what the law, this error is not irreparable?? In fact, this is government procurement, spend the taxpayers money, "less money , bought goods "is a must. Tender if the Government keep a close eye defects link, and thereby influence the outcome of the procurement, give up the best offer cost-effective, it is obviously runs the risk of error. Further still, even if the tender does Gree failed, not to adopt, then, when as many as five companies bid (December 15, 2008 "Oriental? Look Weekly," a report on the tender), offer Gree on the petrochemical industry in Guangdong is also under construction group three, the normal logic, Panyu Central Hospital after giving up Gree, should give priority to consider the second low bid, why are these three offer a lower not be considered, but why buy the most expensive, are the three companies are also all there is the tender "text error"?
Government procurement is a big cake?? 2008, the scale of the national government procurement reached more than 5900 billion (October 21, 2009, "Economic Information Daily"), piece of cake because the temptation is great, therefore, enterprises sharing the pie, in the process of cutting the pie is easy to generate gray interests chain, procurement of breeding corruption. The greatest lesson of this course ought to Zhuzhou, Hunan viaduct collapse, when the bursting of the tender selected is an "expensive" (May 17, 2009 Xinhua News Agency reported). Because the government there are also many people who purchase the Lok Ma. Then think of Guangzhou in 2007 has already broken out of such government procurement corruption "Woan" (December 12, 2007 Xinhua News Agency reported) of the "criminal record", this time, the Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance really have a good explanation clearly not.
Government is the people's "butler" did not enjoy the "high-priced luxury goods," right. "Steward" of spending habits, not normal. Gree will finance bureau to court, let us hope?? This lawsuit if they can have a successful outcome, should be the "Government Procurement Law" and an excellent publicity, a public opinion a wonderful case of government procurement.
I am an expert from Mp3 Player Manufacturers, usually analyzes all kind of industries situation, such as car musical horns , musical car horns.
Processing your request, Please wait....
