The purchase of vehicles and industrial policies contrary to
The NDRC official said to the media 19, is studying the Guiyang City last week issued a “vehicle restriction order” policy, “This does not meet the” automobile industry restructuring and revitalization plan, “which planning control in 2012, and now do not expire, we never advocated for a restriction. ” This is the purchase of state departments of Guiyang, the first clear. (July 20, according to “Economic Information Daily”)
2009, promulgated the “automobile industry restructuring and revitalization plan” clearly states, regions, departments should seriously clean up the existing restrictions on vehicle purchase to cancel the unreasonable provisions, which set out, including the “license registration number.” However, Beijing Automotive Sales Order issued in the midst of controversy after the introduction of Guiyang has suddenly and unexpectedly the purchase order, maybe third, fourth cities will soon follow suit.
The purchase of vehicles and industrial policies to fight, so that industrial policy is not only embarrassing but also very embarrassing to the relevant departments. For example, the Ministry of Industry officials acknowledge that the local restriction is difficult to directly issued a document “green light stop.” In other words, the relevant department of industrial policy in violation of local restriction that it only shows their attitude, it is difficult as there are substantial.
At the same time, this runs counter to the situation but also to place purchase orders and questions — the controversial introduction of car restriction policy that is neither based on, there is no legal basis, coupled with the lack of public support, the introduction of the purchase order is completely changed into local government will.
The reason why the purchase of automotive and industrial policy runs counter to the big side, there are two main reasons:
On the one hand, the automobile industry policy is too rigid, the lack of long-term vision. As we all know, in 2009 introduced the “automobile industry restructuring and revitalization plan” aims to address the global financial crisis on the automotive industry and other pillar industries, and today, the financial crisis are long gone, the economic environment, market conditions had changed, continue to implement the industrial policy has been such a significant date.
In fact, industrial planning policy should be across the years in long-term policy to develop the plan would not only be forward-looking industry should also have some flexibility. Industry policy rigidities, lack of forward-looking consequences, ranging from those who make policy and policy implementation, embarrassment, heavy industry is likely to be misleading. Now, the auto industry to “auto industry restructuring and revitalization plan” is based on dissatisfaction with the purchase of vehicles, although there may be benefits to industry in trouble, but it exposed the level of industrial policies.
On the other hand, the lack of rule of law and individual awareness of both the local government, democratic awareness, lack of traffic congestion management wisdom. Although the purchase of local government introduced in order to alleviate urban traffic congestion is, is well-intentioned, but the purchase of more than a car good there are many more feasible solution, can effectively deal with the traffic pressure, for example, a large number of constraints than the limit of the bus purchase of private cars more efficient, but there is no local government to adopt; even abroad can copy a good management tool to use, but do not want to learn; whether to change the positioning of urban functions, or improved road design, road construction, traffic control, etc. can be said to be able to effectively alleviate traffic congestion, and some of our favorite city manager has chosen to use simple, brutal means to purchase
Processing your request, Please wait....
