Master Li Ao in Hong Kong Book Fair on Sunday’s speech was his first lecture.
Master Li Ao in Hong Kong Book Fair on Sunday’s speech was his first lecture in Hong Kong; Although the news reports the next day did not fire the same day, Brigitte Lin speech, but still attracted enthusiastic attention.
This called “Chinese intellectuals to the” basic speech to Hong Kong-based, but also addressed the mainland and Taiwan’s politics. Li Ao’s speech, but a lot of controversy not only basic facts, logic arguments unconvincing.
The first is theoretical. Li Ao is not necessarily true that the two-party democracy, one-party system is not necessarily bad. The former example is the U.S. Congress unanimously passed bipartisan resolutions against Iraq, which is a violation of the UN Charter. Examples of the latter is no corruption in Singapore.
Master Li to discuss the way the problem is not so sure. Two-party system with one-party system is democratic, or more manufacturing system which corruption is a serious dispute, but should be based on more rigorous logical argument or empirical data, rather than just cite two examples to refute. Of course, not equal to two-party democracy, but at least there is a real two-party system of checks and balances and oversight, will not let those who have and the dominance of political power. In particular, the issue of corruption, such checks and balances help to curb corruption; at least in the process of political competition, politicians will expose each other’s wounds. Singapore, good governance is an important exception, of course, but depends on other historical and institutional reasons, can not be used to negate the tyranny and corruption related to the general argument.
In this one-party system will not say more prone to corruption, the Master Li is more to China, for example, “People’s Republic of corruption now, you feel worried about it? I was not worried, why? Annual People’s Republic of The property is two Gigabit, corruption is 50 million. the whole compared to, is thousandths. thousandths nothing. “fifty million of this figure may even Zhongnanhai will be embarrassed.
About Hong Kong, Li Ao said he had hoped to leave Hong Kong after 1997 will be a British-style democracy, but now Hong Kong’s political chaos began, and he thought they should not go to fight for democracy, especially Taiwan-style democracy, but should first economic engage in them.
Perhaps these words sound like a lot of people would agree. Now, however, a great democratic movement in Hong Kong is the last part of reimbursing the pursuit of economic development consequences. Hong Kong is now in the advanced economies of the uneven distribution of wealth where the most serious, serious property hegemony so that the public is deeply dissatisfied with the political system in the system of functional constituencies and to ensure that unfair social and economic policies. So the pursuit of democracy in Hong Kong in recent years, called for the abolition of functional constituencies, is to correct the deviation of past economic development of doctrine, hoping to establish a more fair and just society. The most concrete example of this is after 80 young people’s anti-high-speed rail, to defend the garden village movement. Not to say that democracy and self-governance itself is an important value. So, instead of people do not want to engage in economic, but recognize that economic development, there are many important basic values.
Li Ao said that the issue of democratic development in Hong Kong from Taipei is getting closer, and farther away from London. The problem is, both mentioned Taiwan legislators in addition to its more civilized, but in the end what is a significant difference? Taiwan politicians poor quality of democracy is certainly a flaw, but it may be many problems in the practice of democracy in Taiwan relatively minor problems, others such as money politics seriously, civic participation and so forth. If you just start to see some of the Hong Kong legislature acts of disorder, said that democracy is a desktop, this is really superficial comments. Moreover, regardless of what Taiwan’s democracy and institutional differences between the UK (such as the constitutional system), at least they have the basic elements of democracy: a basic civil rights, there are various channels to express political opinions, and could decide the political leaders. This is what many people in Hong Kong and the mainland goal.
Lee may want to re-master a little bit deeper, not to Hong Kong after the British-style democracy, in the end because of what? Who let them develop democracy? Why do democrats want to throw things in Parliament? Why do young men took to the streets surrounded by the Legislative Council? The question of course is a higher power behind the Hong Kong Government. Especially when Hong Kong Chief Executive is responsible for Beijing, not responsible for Hong Kong public opinion, they naturally have the arrogance of power, so let members and the public dissatisfaction. But I am afraid that Master Li do not want to touch the key issues.
Master Li’s lecture last, in fact, said has put out his bottom line. He suggested that we should not do Qu Yuan, do not make Yin Hai-kuang, Do not go against Beijing, but to embrace the Communist Party, and good with him, advised him to improve. We respect the choice of masters, but also respect for the efforts of reformers inside and outside of institutions. However, this may not be the sole direction of the Chinese intellectuals.The actual true religion Jeans which Shaun Lubell produced had been legitimately, American-made, as well as a direct result their enthusiasm.Brief ladies usually have difficulties to find the actual true religion sale along with ideal duration as well as dimension.The actual purchase is actually introduced a minimum of four occasions each year. Look out for these types of product sales simply because it’s the greatest spot to discover true religion outlet which match your own dimension as well as elevation.
Processing your request, Please wait....
