Nikon D3, D300 Or Nikon D700 ?
In case you place a Nikon D300 along with a D700 side by side and cover the model number with a piece of tape, you’ll have a bit of difficulty distinguishing which is which. Look a bit further at the two of them and you’ll still be difficult pressed to see any distinction. Pick the two bodies up and still you’ll be pressed to really feel any distinction. What are the differences then? It’s nearly all within the innards as they say.
The D3 is an additional matter altogether. It’s large and heavy compared to the other people. Whenever you deal with a D3, you KNOW you might be holding the most effective of the very best.
All 3 are single lens reflex digital cameras No distinction there.
All will accept nearly any Nikon lens manufactured after 1974. No distinction you say. Ah, not so. The distinction is far more in how every camera “sees” via the lens. With out becoming technical, suffice it to say that the D3 and D700 will “see” an FX lens at the correct picture angle for an FX lens. To put that just, a 50mm focal length lens might be a true 50mm lens on the D3 and D700. That exact same lens, when placed on the D300, will look like it’s a 75mm lens. Nonetheless, if a DX lens is placed on the D3 or D700, the camera will sense it and will set the focal length to the DX format. On the D3 and D700 you will discover settings though which will force the camera to take a look at a lens as though it’s an FX lens.
D3 successful pixels = 12.1 Megapixels
D300 efficient pixels = 12.three Megapixels
D700 efficient pixels = 12.1 Megapixels
In the event you look via the rest of the specifications for every camera, you’ll discover that for the most component they’re the exact same or comparable. Actually, for the majority of operations which are explained within the Users Manual, the D300 and D700 manuals are the exact same. The D3 is really a class of its own.
The D700 weighs in with a 170 gram benefit over the D300 so there’s obviously a bit far more of “something” in its innards. The D3, the heavyweight of the lot comes in at about 500 grams or about a pound heavier than the D700. Lifting this extra weight on a 5 or 6 hour wedding shoot could be a chore.
Having utilized all of the models, I discovered that there was rather small distinction within the images under comparable lighting conditions. The D700 seemed (in my opinion) to deal with varying lighting conditions slightly much better than its D300 cousin. The D3 was to my naked eye no much better on an A4 photo.
Price of the bodies only at 1 on the web shop had been these:
D300 = $2188.00
D700 = $3494.00
D3 = $5785.00
So, is the extra price worth buying the D700 or would 1 be much better served to invest an extra a number of thousand and opt for the top of the line D3? I reckon it depends on your pocketbook.
Every is really a fine camera in its own correct and I have discovered that all perform admirably. Between the D300 and D700, I doubt that an individual would notice any appreciable distinction in typical use.
The D3 is really a bit distinct though. For the benefits offered over the other two, the extra weight and size of the D3 makes it a chore to carry on lengthy shoots and as a working professional, I would opt for the D700 in those instances like weddings and use an additional D700 with a D300 as a backup.
I would take the price distinction that I would save on the D700 and invest it within the most effective lens Nikon offers that I could afford.
To find out more about this topic, visit Nikon D3 Price
Processing your request, Please wait....
