Essay Writing – Support the Thesis
What “everyone think? When we talk about the importance of the argument, we are confused philosophical questions too quickly.So, let’s start by defining land-to-earth of argumentation as a process —
Reasoning implies a deliberate attempt to understand what is true and what is best. Reasoning thought a chain of causation that follows, and the reason may be synonymous with the word question.
According to this definition, the reasoning of cause and effect, whether a simple relationship of cause and effect or a chain of cause and effect. But what is a cause and effect?
Cause and effect is a relationship in which one thing, the so-called cause, doing something else happens, and that “something else” that the result is called the effect. For example, a boy hits a ball with a bat and the ball will break through a window. In this case, the cause of the boy the ball, and the effect of breaking the window.
thinking of cause and effect is something we use every day, so we are particularly conscious or not. So, I’m sure you’ll recognize this common, informal rules of cause and effect:
1. Sequence — The cause comes first, and the effect will follow.
2. — If this cause is present, the effect is always present.
3. Absent — If the cause is not present, the effect is always absent.
Well, here is a true, generally accepted, but it is generally easy, for example, these rules are applied to a historical situation —
For centuries in Europe were only white swans have ever seen. All observations, records and information about the swans in Europe have shown that they were always white. It was therefore in order, as a truth claim “All swans are white.” (Another way of saying: “If it’s a swan, she is white.”)
The issue in this case is: since Europeans had taken place and folders — anecdotes, diaries, histories of family hand-me-down stories, reviews, stories (local, regional, cultural ), memories, myths and stories followed by oral history — they were known as the only white swans. No other color swan ever known in Europe, not a world traveler never been word of his travels in Europe, there is never a swan in a color other than white.
Because of all the experience and knowledge, the effect was that Europeans believed that all swans were white all over the world. It was a good argument, based on centuries of accumulated evidence over a wide geographic area and different cultures.
A lesson of the black swan event, this argument works for most, but not always, because we can not really examine the world on a particular issue or fact (at least not yet, but science in the world and technologies are not advanced, but …). And that’s what he said authoritatively, “always there” or not “is still missing.” Of course, in the absence of knowledge with everyone who helps us all to continue to support, please fill gaps in our knowledge and therefore it is important to understand the functioning of the arguments in the trial.
In his essay is new point of view of George Orwell a cause and effect reversed in the second paragraph:
If any of these habits rid you think clearly and think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration: so that the fight against bad English is not frivolous and is not an issuefor the professional writer.
Let’s degrading in a number of causes and effects:
Cause: If you get this [bad language] get rid of habits
EFFECT: one can think more clearly,
Cause: and to think clearly is a necessary first step towards
EFFECT: regeneration policy
It should be added, clearly and without ambiguity the old view —
Cause: regeneration policy is a necessary step towards
EFFECT: reversal of the decline and decay of civilization
Accepted ………………( the old view that the discourse of reverse degenerate and collapse, with civilization)
As you can see that the first effect is the second cause, and the second effect is the third issue, which is a short chain of cause and effect thinking.
Now we want to see how Orwell meets the rules of cause and effect with the new version to support his thesis:
Sequence — First, get rid of bad habits, language
……………………( LOW represented by two small examples)
…………………… According to think clearly and to reverse the decline of civilization
……………………( WATCH NOT through a story or example, merely states as true)
— If this good political use of language is present,
………………. Clearer thinking and improvement of civilization is always present
……………….( Any resemblance of a story or example, as claimed true)
Absent — if good political use of language does not exist
……………… Clearer thinking is always absent
Many consider ………………( old shows examples of clear thinking, as always absent)
Have you noticed that I was “was weak” for the first part of the sequence usually get the following two examples of George Orwell’s memory “get rid of bad habits, language” is based –
Two recent examples were explore every possibility and move heaven and earth, who has killed by the contempt of some journalists.
With regard to showing how these two examples would help politicians “to think clearly and to reverse the decline of civilization” for the rear part of the rule of the sequence, it is certainly “notrepresented. “None of the stories, examples or argumentation is provided to assist in this direction.
And “not shown” to the current system? Whoa! Orwell did not use stories, examples or specific speculation to show that what he is really proposing to work or to work or even worked at one time or place in history.
And although Orwell recounts his 6-point formula to get rid of bad language towards the end, it does not give an example or story or specific speculation, none of these suggestions really work or even see some kind of effect positive.
Wow! How can he get rid of it? Why not go and say that when you read his essay?
After careful consideration, I think I discovered the reason: Orwell’s time are latecomers to spend his old point of view with all these examples of misuse of language by politicians.
We can see what he says is true about each of these examples.But there are so many that it is, well, it looks much like a tidal seller, our ears with such a torrent of words, we try to keep mentally tired of what he says is changing. And then we’re just happy to get to the end of every speech without filtering mentally all the arguments of what is said.
I think it is. However, I do not honestly believe everything Orwell on us. He just did not no examples of the impact of his new theory to share with us because of what he had proposed not implemented by a large group of people, there had no visible effect. And maybe, just maybe, all his examples tired of it, too!
What Orwell have to do is give some examples of special effects that would happen, he predicts, and how it would happen gradually, logically, when his six suggestions were followed. It would have been the case, I think.
Interesting, is not it?
Teachers and publishers in general seem like Orwell’s Essay Writing, despite its flaws, why? Because of the importance of news, the new view that provides Orwell, is that reason. Orwell’s principle of “good language skills is a good reflection” rings true for us all, even if his argument is rather weak support for him and he offers no examples of new view.
Processing your request, Please wait....
