Princes Diana Death Was A Conspiracy
Princes Diana Spencer was a well known royalty. She had captured the heart of many in the world for her beauty and humanitarian activities. She was darling to many people who had interacted with her during her life. The death of princes Diana is one of the most publicized and important tragedies in the twentieth century (Essortment, 2009). Princes Diana Spencer died on august 31, 1997 in Paris France in a car accident. The accident occurred in bridge tunnel near Pont DeLa’alma over river Seine, West of Paris. By the time of her death they were driving with her fiancee Dodi Fayed. Diana was not the only one who died from the crash but also Dodi and the driver of the Mercedes. After the crush Diana was taken to one of the best hospitals in Europe, Lapitie salpettriere. The surgeons considered her condition serious when they discovered that her coronary artery was ruptured. Diana died two hours later while undergoing surgery at 4.00 a.m. The doctors did not announce her death until 4.30 a.m. Princes Diana was 36 years old at the time of her death (LondonNet, 2009).
Many theories have been developed which try to explain the controversial death of princes Diana. Different people have given divergent views on what they think caused the death. Neither the court nor the media reports has been able to come up with a good explanation of what happened in the fateful day. This paper tries to unravel this controversial subject of Princes Diana death.
After the divorce of princes Diana with Prince Charles her life took a dramatic turn, the media was always on her toes and her life became more publicized. Sources confirm that she believed that her husband planned to make her life difficult and miserable. Princes Diana relationship with the royal family became sour (Internaxx, 2009).
Shortly after her divorce, stories started to rock the media about her relationship with Hasnat Khan who was a doctor. This relationship stories rubbed the royal family the wrong way. First princes Diana was to be the mother of the next king of England .The royal family felt that princes Diana had stripped the royal family. The information that Diana was to get married to doctor Hasnt khan did not go well with prince Charles. Prince Diana last relationship with Dido her fiancee was the most controversial. Dido was of Muslim origin and it is believed that Princes Diana was pregnant with him at the time they met their fateful death.
On my opinion princes Diana death was a conspiracy and not an accident. First her bad relationship with Prince Charles and the royal family brings out suspicion in this accident. The motive behind the death of Prince Diana may have been to prevent her from marring Dodi Fayed. This was to prevent the step brother of the future king becoming a Muslim. There was also need to protect the new world order from a princess who was an activist with inconsistent ideas like banning of land mines. This shows that the England monarchy reputation and future was at stake and it had to be protected at any cost.
The British intelligence in conjunction with the royal family might have put some small remote controlled bombs in the Mercedes bench that the princes and her fiancee Dodi were traveling in. This theory can be deduced from the events that took place during and after the fateful accident.
The eye witnesses say that they saw a freeing vehicle from the scene of accident immediately after the impact. This information was given by many eye witnesses but the police did not pursue that piece of evidence. This was followed by a number of inconsistencies and peculiarities about the information that was not perused. The British royal interagency did not show any interest to investigate the aspects that showed that the crush seemed an accident. In normal circumstances a small indication that the crush might not have been an accident would have provoked massive scrutiny from this agency.
The report that the vehicle that Princes Diana was driving in was driving at a speed of 120 miles per hour to escape the photographers escapes logic. Why would anyone drive at such a dangerous speed to just escape the photographers? Photographs cannot cause bodily harm. This shows that the driver must have been escaping from a more sinister thing than photographs (John, 1997).