Ediacara biota
History
The first Ediacaran fossils discovered were the disc-shaped Aspidella terranovica in 1868. Their discoverer, A. Murray a geological surveyor, found them useful aids for correlating the age of rocks around Newfoundland. However since they lay below the “Primordial Strata”, the Cambrian strata that were then thought to contain the very first signs of life, it took four years for anybody to dare propose they could be fossils. Elkanah Billings’ proposal was dismissed by his peers on account of their simple form and they were instead declared gas escape structures, inorganic concretions, or even tricks played by a malicious God to promote unbelief. No similar structures elsewhere in the world were then known and the one-sided debate soon fell into obscurity. In 1933, Georg Grich discovered specimens in Namibia but the firm belief that life originated in the Cambrian led to them being assigned to the Cambrian Period and no link to Aspidella was made. In 1946 Reg Sprigg noticed “jellyfishes” in the Ediacara Hills of Australia’s Flinders Ranges but these rocks were believed to be Early Cambrian so, while the discovery sparked some interest, little serious attention was garnered.
It was not until the British discovery of the iconic Charnia in 1957 that the pre-Cambrian was seriously considered as containing life. This frond-shaped fossil was found in England’s Charnwood Forest, and due to the detailed geologic mapping of the British Geological Survey there was no doubt that these fossils sat in Precambrian rocks. Palontologist Martin Glaessner finally made the connection between this and the earlier finds and with a combination of improved dating of existing specimens and an injection of vigour into the search many more instances were recognised.
All specimens discovered until 1967 were in coarse-grained sandstone that prevented preservation of fine details making interpretation difficult. S.B. Misra’s discovery of fossiliferous ash-beds at the Mistaken Point assemblage in Newfoundland changed all this as the delicate detail preserved by the fine ash allowed the description of features that were previously invisible.
Poor communication, combined with the difficulty in correlating globally distinct formations, led to a plethora of different names for the biota. In 1960 the French name “Ediacarien” after the Ediacaran Hills in South Australia, which take their name from aborigine Idiyakra, “water is present” was added to the competing terms “Sinian” and “Vendian” for terminal-Precambrian rocks and these names were also applied to the life-forms. “Ediacaran” and “Ediacarian” were subsequently applied to the epoch or period of geologic time and its corresponding rocks. In March 2004, the International Union of Geological Sciences ended the inconsistency by formally naming the terminal period of the Neoproterozoic after the Australian locality.
Preservation
Modern cyanobacterial mat on the Ediacaran rocks of the White Sea area of Russia
Main article: Ediacaran type preservation
All but the smallest fraction of the fossil record consists of the robust skeletal matter of decayed corpses. Hence, since Ediacaran biota had soft bodies and no skeletons, their abundant preservation is surprising. The absence of burrowing creatures living in the sediments undoubtedly helped; since after the evolution of these organisms in the Cambrian, soft-bodied impressions were usually disturbed before they could fossilize.
Microbial mats
Microbial mats are areas of sediment stabilised by the presence of colonies of microbes which secrete sticky fluids or otherwise bind the sediment particles. They appear to migrate upwards when covered by a thin layer of sediment but this is an illusion caused by the colony’s growth; individuals do not, themselves, move. If too thick a layer of sediment is deposited before they can grow or reproduce through it parts of the colony will die leaving behind fossils with a characteristically wrinkled (“elephant skin”) and tubercular texture.
The fossil Charniodiscus is barely distinguishable from the “elephant skin” texture on this cast.
Some Ediacaran strata with the texture characteristic of microbial mats contain fossils and Ediacaran fossils are almost never found in beds that do not contain these microbial mats. Although microbial mats were once widespread the evolution of grazing organisms in the Cambrian vastly reduced their numbers and these communities are now limited to inhospitable refugia where predators cannot survive long enough to eat them such as the stromatolites found in Hamelin Pool Marine Nature Reserve in Shark Bay, Western Australia where the salt levels can be as high as 1.5 or 2 times the normal level of the surrounding sea.
Fossilisation
The preservation of these fossils is one of their great fascinations to science. As soft-bodied organisms they would normally not fossilise and, unlike later soft-bodied fossil biota such as the Burgess Shale or Solnhofen Limestone, the Ediacara biota is not found in a restricted environment subject to unusual local conditions: they were a global phenomenon. The processes that were operating must have been systemic and worldwide. There was something very different about the Ediacaran Period that permitted these delicate creatures to be left behind and it is thought that the fossils were preserved by virtue of rapid covering by ash or sand trapping them against the mud or microbial mats on which they lived. Ash beds provide more detail and can readily be precisely dated to the nearest million years or better by means of radiometric dating. However it is more common to find Ediacaran fossils under sandy beds deposited by storms or high-energy bottom-scraping ocean currents known as turbidites. Soft-bodied organisms today almost never fossilise during such events but the presence of widespread microbial mats probably aided preservation by stabilising their impressions in the sediment below.
What is preserved?
The rate of cementation of the overlying substrate relative to the rate of decomposition of the organism determines whether the top or bottom surface of an organism is preserved. Most disc-shaped fossils decomposed before the overlying sediment was cemented, the ash or sand then slumped in to fill the void, leaving a cast of the underside of the organism.
Conversely, quilted fossils tend to decompose after the cementation of the overlying sediment; hence their upper surfaces are preserved. Their more resistant nature is reflected in the fact that in rare occasions quilted fossils are found within storm beds as the high-energy sedimentation did not destroy them as it would have the less-resistant discs. Further, in some cases, the bacterial precipitation of minerals formed a “death mask” creating a mould of the organism.
Morphology
Forms of Ediacaran fossil
The earliest discovered potential embryo, preserved within an acanthomorphic acritarch. The term ‘acritarch’ describes a range of unclassified cell-like fossils.
Tateana inflata (= ‘Cyclomedusa’ radiata) is the attachment disk of an unknown organism. Metric scale.
A cast of the quilted Charnia, the first accepted complex Precambrian organism. Charnia was once interpreted as a relative of the sea-pens.
Spriggina, a possible precursor to the trilobites, may be one of the predators that led to the demise of the Ediacaran fauna and subsequent diversification of animals.
A late Ediacaran trace fossil preserved on a bedding plane.
A chain of trace fossils created by a grazing Yorgia, terminating with a body fossil of the organism itself (right).
The Ediacaran biota exhibited a vast range of morphological characteristics. Size ranged from millimetres to metres; complexity from “blob-like” to intricate; rigidity from sturdy and resistant to jelly-soft. Almost all forms of symmetry were present. These organisms differed from earlier fossils by displaying an organised, differentiated multicellular construction and centimetre-plus sizes.
These disparate morphologies can be broadly grouped into form taxa:
“Embryos”
Recent discoveries of Precambrian multicellular life have been dominated by reports of embryos, particularly from the Doushantuo Formation in China. Some finds generated intense media excitement though some have claimed they are instead inorganic structures formed by the precipitation of minerals on the inside of a hole. Other “embryos” have been interpreted as the remains of the giant sulfur-reducing bacteria akin to Thiomargarita, a view which is highly contested yet gradually gaining supporters.
Microfossils dating from 632.5 million years ago just 3 million years after the end of the Cryogenian glaciations may represent embryonic ‘resting stages’ in the life cycle of the earliest known animals.
An alternative proposal is that these structures represent adult stages of the animals of this period.
Discs
Circular fossils, such as Ediacaria, Cyclomedusa and Rugoconites led to the initial identification of Ediacaran fossils as cnidaria which include jellyfish and corals. Further examination has provided alternative interpretations of all disc-shaped fossils: not one is now confidently recognised as a jellyfish. Alternate explanations include holdfasts, protists and sea anemones; the patterns displayed where two meet have led to many ‘individuals’ being identified as microbial colonies, and yet others may represent scratch marks formed as stalked organisms spun around their holdfasts. Useful diagnostic characters are often lacking because only the underside of the organism is preserved by fossilization.
Bags
Fossils such as Pteridinium preserved within sediment layers resemble “mud-filled bags”. The scientific community is a long way from reaching a consensus on their interpretation.
Quilted organisms
The organisms considered in Seilacher’s revised definition of the Vendobionta share a “quilted” appearance and resembled an inflatable mattress. Sometimes these quilts would be torn or ruptured prior to preservation: such damaged specimens provide valuable clues in the reconstruction process. For example the three (or more) petaloid fronds of Swartpuntia germsi could only be recognised in a posthumously damaged specimen usually multiple fronds were hidden as burial squashed the organisms flat.
These organisms appear to form two groups; the fractal rangeomorphs and the simpler erniettomorphs. Including such fossils as the iconic Charnia and Swartpuntia the group is both the most iconic of the Ediacaran biota and the most difficult to place within the existing tree of life. Lacking any mouth, gut, reproductive organs, or indeed any evidence of internal anatomy, their lifestyle was somewhat peculiar by modern standards; the most widely accepted hypothesis holds that they sucked nutrients out of the surrounding seawater by osmosis.
Non-Ediacaran Ediacarans
Some Ediacaran organisms have more complex details preserved which has allowed them to be interpreted as possible early forms of living phyla excluding them from some definitions of the Ediacaran biota.
The earliest such fossil is the reputed bilaterian Vernanimalcula claimed by some, however, to represent the infilling of an egg-sac or acritarch. Later examples are almost universally accepted as bilaterians and include the mollusc-like Kimberella, Spriggina (pictured) and the shield-shaped Parvancorina whose affinities are currently debated.
A suite of fossils known as the Small shelly fossils are represented in the Ediacaran, most famously by Cloudina a shelly tube-like fossil that often shows evidence of predatory boring, suggesting that whilst predation may not have been common in the Ediacaran Period it was at least present.
Representatives of modern taxa existed in the Ediacaran, some of which are recognisable today. Sponges, red and green alg, protists and bacteria are all easily recognisable with some pre-dating the Ediacaran by thousands of millions of years . Possible arthropods have also been described.
Trace fossils
With the exception of some very simple vertical burrows(p186) the only Ediacaran burrows are horizontal lying on or just below the surface. Such burrows have been taken to imply the presence of motile organisms with heads which would probably have had a bilateral symmetry. This could place them in the bilateral clade of animals but they could also have been made by simpler organisms feeding as they slowly rolled along the sea floor. Putative “burrows” dating as far back as 1,100 million years may have been made by animals which fed on the undersides of microbial mats which would have shielded them from a chemically unpleasant ocean; however their uneven width and tapering ends make a biological origin so difficult to defend that even the original proponent no longer believes they are authentic.
The burrows observed imply simple behaviour and the complex efficient feeding traces common from the start of the Cambrian are absent. Some Ediacaran fossils, especially discs, have been interpreted tentatively as trace fossils but this hypothesis has not gained widespread acceptance. As well as burrows, some trace fossils have been found directly associated with an Ediacaran fossil. Yorgia and Dickinsonia are often found at the end of long pathways of trace fossils matching their shape; these fossils are thought to be associated with cilliarty feeding but the precise method of formation of these disconnected and overlapping fossils largely remains a mystery. The potential mollusc Kimberella is associated with scratch marks, perhaps formed by a radula.
Biologist Mikhail Matz from The University of Texas at Austin and his colleagues recently discovered grape-sized protists, single-celled organisms, which are able to make tracks resembling those of multi-cellular animals. Although these organisms are slow-moving their movement is persistent. This suggests that some of the trace fossils of the Ediacara may have been from protists making it difficult to find distinctions between single- and multi-cellular life in the early fossil record.
Classification and interpretation
Classification of the Ediacarans is difficult, and hence a variety of theories exist as to their placement on the tree of life.
A sea-pen, a modern cnidarian bearing a passing resemblance to Charnia
Cnidarians
Since the most primitive eumetazoans multi-cellular animals with tissues are cnidarians, the first attempt to categorise these fossils designated them as jellyfish and sea-pens. However, detailed study of their growth pattern has discounted this hypothesis.
“The dawn of animal life”
Martin Glaessner proposed in The dawn of animal life (1984) that the Ediacara biota were recognisable crown group members of modern phyla, but were unfamiliar because they had yet to evolve the characteristic features we use in modern classification. Adolf Seilacher responded by suggesting that the Ediacaran sees animals usurping giant protists as the dominant life form.
In 1986 Mark McMenamin claimed that Ediacarans did not possess an embryonic stage, and thus could not be animals. He believed that they independently evolved a nervous system and brains, meaning that “the path toward intelligent life was embarked upon more than once on this planet”, though this idea has not been widely accepted.
New phylum
Seilacher most famously suggested that the Ediacaran organisms represented a unique and extinct grouping of related forms descended from a common ancestor (clade) and created the kingdom Vendozoa, named after the now-obsolete Vendian era. He later excluded fossils identified as metazoans and relaunched the phylum “Vendobionta”.
He described the Vendobionta as quilted cnidarians lacking stinging cells. This absence precludes the current cnidarian method of feeding, so Seilacher suggested that the organisms may have survived by symbiosis with photosynthetic or chemoautotrophic organisms.
Lichen with a 3D structure may be preserved in a fashion similar to wood.
Lichens
Gregory Retallack’s hypothesis that Ediacaran organisms were lichens has failed to gain widespread acceptance. He argues that the fossils are not as squashed as jellyfish fossilised in similar situations, and their relief is closer to petrified wood. He points out the chitinous walls of lichen colonies would provide a similar resistance to compaction, and claims the large size of the organisms sometimes over a metre across, far larger than any of the preserved burrows also hints against a classification with the animals.
Other interpretations
Almost every possible phylum has been used to accommodate the Ediacaran biota at some point, from alg, to protists known as foraminifera, to fungi to bacterial or microbial colonies, to hypothetical intermediates between plants and animals.
Origin
It took almost 4 billion years from the formation of the Earth for the Ediacaran fossils to first appear, 655 million years ago. Whilst putative fossils are reported from 3,460 million years ago, the first uncontroversial evidence for life is found 2,700 million years ago, and cells with nuclei certainly existed by 1,200 million years ago: why did it take so long for forms with an Ediacaran grade of organisation to appear?
It could be that no special explanation is required: the slow process of evolution simply required 4 billion years to accumulate the necessary adaptations. Indeed, there does seem to be a slow increase in the maximum level of complexity seen over this time, with more and more complex forms of life evolving as time progresses, with traces of earlier semi-complex life such as Nimbia, found in the 610 million year old Twitya formation, possibly displaying the most complex morphology of the time.
Global ice sheets may have delayed or prevented the establishment of multicellular life.
The alternative train of thought is that it was simply not advantageous to be large until the appearance of the Ediacarans: the environment favoured the small over the large. Examples of such scenarios today include plankton, whose small size allows them to reproduce rapidly to take advantage of ephemerally abundant nutrients in algal blooms. But for large size never to be favourable, the environment would have to be very different indeed.
A primary size-limiting factor is the amount of atmospheric oxygen. Without a complex circulatory system, low concentrations of oxygen cannot reach the centre of an organism quickly enough to supply its metabolic demand.
On the early earth, reactive elements such as iron and uranium existed in a reduced form; these would react with any free oxygen produced by photosynthesising organisms. Oxygen would not be able to build up in the atmosphere until all the iron had rusted (producing banded iron formations), and other reactive elements had also been oxidised. Donald Canfield detected records of the first significant quantities of atmospheric oxygen just before the first Ediacaran fossils appeared and the presence of atmospheric oxygen was soon heralded as a possible trigger for the Ediacaran radiation. Oxygen seems to have accumulated in two pulses; the rise of small, sessile (stationary) organisms seems to correlate with an early oxygenation event, with larger and mobile organisms appearing around the second pulse of oxygenation. However, the assumptions underlying the reconstruction of atmospheric composition have attracted some criticism, with widespread anoxia having little effect on life where it occurs inin the Early Cambrian and the Cretaceous.
Periods of intense cold have also been suggested as a barrier to the evolution of multicellular life. The earliest known embryos, from China’s Doushantuo Formation, appear just a million years after the Earth emerged from a global glaciation, suggesting that ice cover and cold oceans may have prevented the emergence of multicellular life. Potentially, complex life may have evolved before these glaciations, and been wiped out. However, the diversity of life in modern Antarctica has sparked disagreement over whether cold temperatures increase or decrease the rate of evolution.
In early 2008 a team analysed the range of basic body structures (“disparity”) of Ediacaran organisms from three different fossil beds: Avalon in Canada, 575 to 565 million years ago; White Sea in Russia, 560 to 550 million years ago; and Nama in Namibia, 550 to 542 million years ago, immediately before the start of the Cambrian. They found that, while the White Sea assemblage had the most species, there was no significant difference in disparity between the three groups, and concluded that before the beginning of the Avalon timespan these organisms must have gone through their own evolutionary “explosion”, which may have been similar to the famous Cambrian explosion .
Disappearance
The low resolution of the fossil record means that the disappearance of the Ediacarans remains something of a mystery. There appears to have been a relatively abrupt disappearance at the end of the Ediacaran period; reports of Cambrian “Ediacarans” are not universally accepted. The cause and reality of this disappearance is open to debate.
Preservation bias
The sudden vanishing of Ediacaran fossils at the Cambrian boundary could simply be because conditions no longer favoured the fossilisation of Ediacaran organisms, which may have continued to thrive unpreserved. However, if they were common, more than the occasional specimen might be expected in exceptionally preserved fossil assemblages (Konservat-Lagersttten) such as the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang unless such assemblages represent an environment never occupied by the Ediacaran biota, or unsuitable conditions for their preservation.
Kimberella may have had a predatory or grazing lifestyle.
Predation and grazing
It is suggested that by the Early Cambrian, organisms higher in the food chain caused the microbial mats to largely disappear. If these grazers first appeared as the Ediacaran biota started to decline, then it may suggest that they destabilised the microbial substrate, leading to displacement or detachment of the biota; or that the destruction of the mat destabilised the ecosystem, causing extinctions.
Alternatively, skeletonised animals could have fed directly on the relatively undefended Ediacaran biota. However, if the interpretation of the Ediacaran age Kimberella as a grazer is correct then this suggests that the biota had already had limited exposure to “predation”.
There is however little evidence for any trace fossils in the Ediacaran Period, which may speak against the active grazing theory. Further the onset of the Cambrian Period is defined by the appearance of a worldwide trace fossil assemblage, quite distinct from the activity-barren Ediacaran Period.
Cambrian animals such as Waptia may have competed with, or fed upon, Ediacaran life-forms.
Competition
It is possible that increased competition due to the evolution of key innovations amongst other groups, perhaps as a response to predation, drove the Ediacaran biota from their niches. However, this argument has not successfully explained similar phenomena. For instance, the bivalve molluscs’ “competitive exclusion” of brachiopods was eventually deemed to be a coincidental result of two unrelated trends.
Change in environmental conditions
While it is difficult to infer the effect of changing planetary conditions on organisms, communities and ecosystems, great changes were happening at the end of the Precambrian and the start of the Early Cambrian. The breakup of the supercontinents, rising sea levels (creating shallow, “life-friendly” seas), a nutrient crisis, fluctuations in atmospheric composition, including oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, and changes in ocean chemistry (promoting biomineralisation) could all have played a part.
Assemblages
Ediacaran-type fossils are recognised globally in 25 localities and a variety of depositional conditions, and are commonly grouped into three main types, named after typical localities. Each assemblage tends to occupy its own region of morphospace, and after an initial burst of diversification changes little for the rest of its existence.
Avalon-type assemblage
The Avalon-type assemblage is defined at Mistaken Point in Canada, the oldest locality with a large quantity of Ediacaran fossils. The assemblage is easily dated because it contains many fine ash-beds, which are a good source of zircons used in the uranium-lead method of radiometric dating. These fine-grained ash beds also preserve exquisite detail. Constituents of this biota appear to survive through until the extinction of all Ediacarans at the base of the Cambrian.
The biota comprises deep sea dwelling rangeomorphs such as Charnia, all of which share a fractal growth pattern. They were probably preserved in situ (without post-mortem transportation), although this point is not universally accepted. The assemblage, while less diverse than the Ediacara- or Nama-types, resembles Carboniferous suspension-feeding communities, which may suggest filter feeding by most interpretations, the assemblage is found in water too deep for photosynthesis. The low diversity may reflect the depth of water which would restrict speciation opportunities or it may just be too young for evolution to rich biota. Opinion is currently divided between these conflicting hypotheses.
Ediacara-type assemblage
The Ediacara-type assemblage is named after Australia’s Ediacara Hills, and consist of fossils preserved in areas near the mouths of rivers (prodeltaic facies). They are typically found in interbedded sandy and silty layers formed below the normal base of wave-related water motion, but in waters shallow enough to be affected by wave motion during storms. Most fossils are preserved as imprints in microbial mats, but a few are preserved within sandy units.
Biota ranges
view talk edit
Axis scale: millions of years ago, dated with U/Pb of zircons
Nama-type assemblage
The Nama assemblage is best represented in Namibia. Three-dimensional preservation is most common, with organisms preserved in sandy beds containing internal bedding. Dima Grazhdankin believes that these organisms represent burrowing organisms, while Guy Narbonne maintains they were surface dwellers. These beds are sandwiched between units comprising interbedded sandstones, siltstones and shales, with microbial mats, where present, usually containing fossils. The environment is interpreted as sand bars formed at the mouth of a delta’s distributaries.
Significance of assemblages
In the White Sea region of Russia, all three assemblage types have been found in close proximity. This, and the faunas’ considerable temporal overlap, makes it unlikely that they represent evolutionary stages or temporally distinct communities. Since they are globally distributed described on all continents except Antarctica geographical boundaries do not appear to be a factor; the same fossils are found at all palolatitudes (the latitude where the fossil was created, accounting for continental drift) and in separate sedimentary basins.
It is most likely that the three assemblages mark organisms adapted to survival in different environments, and that any apparent patterns in diversity or age are in fact an artefact of the few samples that have been discovered the timeline (right) demonstrates the paucity of Ediacaran fossil-bearing assemblages. An analysis of one of the White Sea fossil beds, where the layers cycle from continental seabed to inter-tidal to estuarine and back again a few times, found that a specific set of Ediacaran organisms was associated with each environment.
As the Ediacaran biota represent an early stage in multicellular life’s history, it is unsurprising that not all possible modes of life are occupied. It has been estimated that of 92 potentially possible modes of life combinations of feeding style, tiering and motility no more than a dozen are occupied by the end of the Ediacaran. Just four are represented in the Avalon assemblage. The lack of large-scale predation and vertical burrowing are perhaps the most significant factors limiting the ecological diversity; the emergence of these during the Early Cambrian allowed the number of lifestyles occupied to rise to 30.
See also
List of Ediacaran genera
Origin of life
Cambrian explosion
Notes
^ Simple multicellular organisms such as red algae evolved at least 1,200 million years ago.
References
^ a b Conway Morris, S. (1993). “Ediacaran-like fossils in Cambrian Burgess Shaleype faunas of North America”. Palaeontology 36 (0031-0239): 593635.
^ Droser and Gehling 2008. Synchronous Aggregate Growth in an Abundant New Ediacaran Tubular Organism. Science 319: 1660-1662
^ a b Seilacher, A. (1992). “Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of Precambrian evolution” (abstract). Journal of the Geological Society, London 149 (4): 607613. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0607. http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/cgi/content/abstract/149/4/607. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Narbonne, Guy (June 2006). “The Origin and Early Evolution of Animals”. Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/recent_pubs1.html. Retrieved 2007-03-10.
^ Waggoner, Ben (1998). “Interpreting the Earliest Metazoan Fossils: What Can We Learn?”. Integrative and Comparative Biology 38 (6): 975982. doi:10.1093/icb/38.6.975. ISSN 1540-7063. http://intl-icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/6/975. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Hofmann, H.J.; Narbonne, G.M., Aitken, J.D. (1990). “Ediacaran remains from intertillite beds in northwestern Canada”. Geology 18 (12): 1199-1202. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/12/1199.
^ a b c d Gehling, James G.; Guy M. Narbonne and Michael M. Anderson (2000). “The First Named Ediacaran Body Fossil, Aspidella terranovica”. Palaeontology 43: 429. doi:10.1111/j.0031-0239.2000.00134.x.
^ Grich, G. (1933) (in German). Die Kuibis-Fossilien der Nama-Formation von Sdwestafrika. 15. pp. 137155.
^ a b Sprigg, R.C. (1947). “Early Cambrian “jellyfishes” of Ediacara, South Australia and Mount John, Kimberly District, Western Australia”. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 73: 7299.
^ “Leicester fossil celebrity: Charnia and the evolution of early life”. http://www.charnia.org.uk/saturday_school_2007.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Sprigg, R.C. (1991). “Martin F Glaessner: Palaeontologist extraordinaire”. Mem. Geol. Soc. India 20: 1320.
^ Glaessner, M.F. (1959). “The oldest fossil faunas of South Australia”. International Journal of Earth Sciences (Springer) 47 (2): 522531. doi:10.1007/BF01800671. http://www.springerlink.com/content/th8t5154382750kq/.
^ Glaessner, Martin F. (1961). “Precambrian Animals”. Science. Am. 204: 7278.
^ Misra, S.B. (1969). “Late Precambrian(?) fossils from southeastern Newfoundland” (abstract). Geol. Soc. America Bull. 80: 21332140. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[2133:LPFFSN]2.0.CO;2. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/80/11/2133.
^ Badham, Mark (2003-01-30). “The Mistaken Point Fossil Assemblage Newfoundland, Canada”. The Miller Museum of Geology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/recent_pubs1.html. Retrieved 2007-03-10.
^ Termier, H.; Termier, G. (1960). “Ldiacarien, premier etage paleontologique” (in French). Rev. Gen. Sci. Et Bull. Assoc. Francaise Avan. Sci. 67 (3-4): 175192.
^ a b Knoll, Andy H.; Walter, M.; Narbonne, G.; Christie-Blick, N. (2006). “The Ediacaran Period: a new addition to the geologic time scale” (PDF). Lethaia 39: 1330. doi:10.1080/00241160500409223. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/KnollWalterNarbonneChristieBlick_Lethaia_2006.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-14. Reprint, 2004 original available here (PDF).
^ a b Stanley, S.M. (1973). “An ecological theory for the sudden origin of multicellular life in the Late Precambrian”. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70 (5): 14861489. doi:10.1073/pnas.70.5.1486. PMID 16592084. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16592084. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ a b Runnegar, B.N.; Fedonkin, M.A. (1992). “Proterozoic metazoan body fossils”. in Schopf, W.J.; Klein, C.. The Proterozoic biosphere. Cambridge University Press. 369388. ISBN 9780521366151. OCLC 23583672 26310475.
^ Burzin, M.B.; Debrenne, F.; Zhuravlev, A.Y. (2001). “Evolution of shallow-water level-bottom communities”. in Zhuravlev, A.Y.; Riding, R.. The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 216237. ISBN 0231505167. OCLC 51852000. http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&docId=100738360. Retrieved 2007-05-06.
^ a b c Narbonne, Guy M. (1998). “The Ediacara biota: A terminal Neoproterozoic experiment in the evolution of life” (PDF). GSA 8 (2): 16. ISSN 1052-5173. ftp://rock.geosociety.org/pub/GSAToday/gt9802.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Bowring, S.A.; Martin, M.W. (2001). “Calibration of the Fossil Record”. in Briggs & Crowther. Palobiology II: A synthesis. Blackwell publishing group. ISBN 9780632051496. OCLC 51481754 55536116. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/book.asp?ref=9780632051496. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Gehling, J.G. (1987). “Earliest known echinoderm A new Ediacaran fossil from the Pound Subgroup of South Australia”. Alcheringa 11: 337345. doi:10.1080/03115518708619143.
^ a b McMenamin, Mark A.S. (2003). “Spriggina is a Trilobitoid Ecdysozoan”. . Seattle Annual Meeting of the GSA. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_62056.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ e.g. Butterfield, N.J. (2007). “Macroevolution and microecology through deep time”. Palaeontology 51 (1): 4155. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x.
^ Chen, J-Y (Jul 2004). “Small Bilaterian Fossils from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian”. Science 305 (5681): 218222. doi:10.1126/science.1099213. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 15178752. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/1099213v1?ijkey=TmRu98UQkv06Y&keytype=ref&siteid=sci. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
^ For example, “Fossil may be ancestor of most animals”. msnbc. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5112628/. Retrieved 2007-06-22. , Leslie Mullen. “Earliest Bilateral Fossil Discovered”. Astrobiology Magazine. http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1005.html. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ a b Bengtson, S. (19 November 2004). “Comment on “Small Bilaterian Fossils from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian””. Science 306 (5700): 1291. doi:10.1126/science.1101338. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 15550644. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5700/1291a.
^ e.g. Bailey, J.V.; Joye, S.B., Kalanetra, K.M., Flood, B.E., Corsetti, F.A. (Jan 2007). “Evidence of giant sulphur bacteria in Neoproterozoic phosphorites” (abstract). Nature 445 (7124): 198201. doi:10.1038/nature05457. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17183268. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7124/abs/nature05457.html. Retrieved 2007-04-28. , summarised by Donoghue, P.C.J. (Jan 2007). “Embryonic identity crisis”. Nature 445 (7124): 155156. doi:10.1038/nature05520. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17183264. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7124/full/nature05520.html. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Xiao et al..’s response to Bailey et al..’s original paper : Xiao, S.; Zhou, C.; Yuan, X. (Apr 2007). “Palaeontology: undressing and redressing Ediacaran embryos” (abstract). Nature 446 (7136): E910. doi:10.1038/nature05753. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17410133. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7136/abs/nature05753.html. Retrieved 2007-06-21. And Bailey et al..’s reply: Bailey, J.V.; Joye, S.B.; Kalanetra, K.M.; Flood, B.E.; Corsetti, F.A. (2007). “Palaeontology: Undressing and redressing Ediacaran embryos (Reply)”. Nature 446 (7136): E1011. doi:10.1038/nature05754. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7136/full/nature05754.html. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Knoll, AH; Javaux, EJ, Hewitt, D., Cohen, P. (Jun 2006). “Eukaryotic organisms in Proterozoic oceans”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361 (1470): 10231038. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1843. ISSN 0962-8436. PMID 16754612. http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/r33709390117w941/. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Leiming, Y.; Zhu, M; Knoll, A; Yuan, X; Zhang, J; Hu, J (2007-04-05). “Doushantuo embryos preserved inside diapause egg cysts” (abstract). Nature 446 (7136): 661663. doi:10.1038/nature05682. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17410174. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v446/n7136/abs/nature05682.html. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
^ Newman, S.A.; Forgacs, G.; Mller, G.B. (2006). “Before programs: The physical origination of multicellular forms”. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 50 (2-3): 289299. doi:10.1387/ijdb.052049sn. ISSN 0214-6282. PMID 16479496. http://www.ijdb.ehu.es/web/contents.php?vol=50&issue=23. Retrieved 2007-11-02.
^ a b c McMenamin M. (1986). The Garden of Ediacara. New York: Columbia Univ Press. ISBN 9780231105590. OCLC 228271905.
^ a b Grazhdankin, D (2001). “Microbial origin of some of the Ediacaran fossils”. . GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001. pp. 177. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2001AM/finalprogram/abstract_21602.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Grazhdankin, D.; Gerdes, G.. “Ediacaran microbial colonies”. Lethaia 40: 201210. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2007.00025.x.
^ Jensen, S.; Gehling, J.G.; Droser, M.L.; Grant, S.W.F. (2002). “A scratch circle origin for the medusoid fossil Kullingia”. Lethaia 35 (4): 291299. doi:10.1080/002411602320790616. http://earthsciences.ucr.edu/docs/Soren_scratch_2002.pdf.
^ a b (a) The only current description, far from universal acceptance, appears as: Grazhdankin, D.; Seilacher, A. (2002). “Underground Vendobionta From Namibia” (abstract). Palaeontology 45 (1): 5778. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00227. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1111/1475-4983.00227/abs/.
^ Narbonne, G.M.; Saylor, B.Z. & Grotzinger, J.P. (1997). “The Youngest Ediacaran Fossils from Southern Africa”. Journal of Paleontology 71 (6): 953967. ISSN 00223360. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00223360%28199711%2971%3A6%3C953%3ATYEFFS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ “On the eve of animal radiation: phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the Ediacara biota”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24 (1): 31. Jan 2009. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.015. ISSN 0169-5347. PMID 18952316. edit
^ Laflamme, M.; Xiao, S.; Kowalewski, M. (Aug 2009). “Osmotrophy in modular Ediacara organisms”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (34): 14438. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904836106. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 19706530. edit
^ Chen, J.-Y. (19 November 2004). “Response to Comment on “Small Bilaterian Fossils from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian””. Science 306 (5700): 1291. doi:10.1126/science.1102328. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci;306/5700/1291b.
^ a b Fedonkin, M.A.; Waggoner, B.M. (Nov 1997). “The Late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism”. Nature 388 (6645): 868871. doi:10.1038/42242. ISSN 0372-9311. PMID 42242. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v388/n6645/full/388868a0.html. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Glaessner, M.F. (1980). “Parvancorina an arthropod from the late Precambrian of South Australia”. Ann. Nat. Hist. Mus. Wien. 83: 8390.
^ For a reinterpretation, see Ivantsov, A.Y.; Malakhovskaya, Y.E., Serezhnikova, E.A. (2004). Abstract “Some Problematic Fossils from the Vendian of the Southeastern White Sea Region”] (in Russian; English translation available) (abstract). Paleontological Journal 38 (1): 19. ISSN 00310301. http://www.maik.rssi.ru/abstract/paleng/4/paleng1_4p1abs.htm Abstract] . Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Germs, G.J.B. (October 1972). “New shelly fossils from Nama Group, South West Africa”. American Journal of Science 272: 752761. ISSN 00029599. http://www.ajsonline.org/cgi/reprint/272/8/752.
^ Ivantsov A. Yu. (2006). “New find of Cambrian type arthropoda from the Vendian of the White Sea, Russia.”. The Second International Palaeontological Congress, Beijing, China. July 17-21, 2006.. http://www.igcp512.org/documents/IPC-T2-Abstracts.pdf.
^ a b Fedonkin, M.A. (1992). “Vendian faunas and the early evolution of Metazoa”. Origin and early evolution of the. New: Plenum. pp. 87. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=gUQMKiJOj64C&pg=PP1&ots=BkpdtmDml1&sig=. Retrieved 2007-03-.
^ Sokolov, B. S.; Iwanowski, A. B., eds (1985). “Paleoichnology of Vendian Metazoa” (in Russian). Vendian System: Historicaleological and Paleontological Foundation, Vol. 1: Paleontology. Moscow: Nauka. pp. 112116.
^ Matz, V.; Frank, M.; Marshall, J.; Widder, A.; Johnsen, S. (Dec 2008). “Giant Deep-Sea Protist Produces Bilaterian-like Traces”. Current Biology 18 (23): 18491854. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.028. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 19026540. edit
^ Seilacher, A.; Bose, P.K.; Pflger, F. (1998-10-02). “Triploblastic Animals More Than 1 Billion Years Ago: Trace Fossil Evidence from India” (abstract). Science 282 (5386): 8083. doi:10.1126/science.282.5386.80.
^ Budd, G.E.; Jensen, S. (2000). “A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla” (abstract). Biological Reviews 75 (02): 253295. doi:10.1017/S000632310000548X. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S000632310000548X. Retrieved 2007-06-27.
^ Jensen, S. (2008). “PALEONTOLOGY: Reading Behavior from the Rocks”. Science 322: 1051. doi:10.1126/science.1166220.
^ Ivantsov, A.Y.; Malakhovskaya, Y.E. (2002). “Giant Traces of Vendian Animals” (in Russian; English translation available) (PDF). Doklady Earth Sciences (Doklady Akademii Nauk) 385 (6): 618622. ISSN 1028334X. http://vend.paleo.ru/pub/Ivantsov_et_Malakhovskaya_2002-e.pdf. Retrieved 2007-05-10.
^ A. Yu. Ivantsov. (2008). “Feeding traces of the Ediacaran animals”. HPF-17 Trace fossils : ichnological concepts and methods. International Geological Congress – Oslo 2008.
^ According to New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusc-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications (2007), “Fedonkin, M.A.; Simonetta, A; Ivantsov, A.Y.”, in Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Komarower, Patricia, The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota, Special publications, 286, London: Geological Society, pp. 157179, doi:10.1144/SP286.12, ISBN 9781862392335, OCLC 156823511 191881597
For a more cynical perspective see Butterfield, N. J. (Dec 2006). “Hooking some stem-group orms: fossil lophotrochozoans in the Burgess Shale”. BioEssays 28 (12): 11611166. doi:10.1002/bies.20507. ISSN 0265-9247. PMID 17120226. edit
^ Donovan, Stephen K., Lewis, David N. (2001). “Fossils explained 35. The Ediacaran biota” (abstract). Geology Today 17 (3): 115120. doi:10.1046/j.0266-6979.2001.00285.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.0266-6979.2001.00285.x/abs/. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Antcliffe, J.B.; Brasier, M.D. (2007). “Charnia and sea pens are poles apart”. Journal of the Geological Society 164 (1): 4951. doi:10.1144/0016-76492006-080. http://jgs.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/164/1/49. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Antcliffe, J.B.; Brasier, M.D. (2007). “Charnia At 50: Developmental Models For Ediacaran Fronds”. Palaeontology 51 (1): 1126. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00738.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2007.00738.x.
^ Glaessner, M.F. (1984). The Dawn of Animal Life: A Biohistorical Study. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521312167. OCLC 9394425.
^ Seilacher, A.; Grazhdankin, D., Legouta, A. (2003). “Ediacaran biota: The dawn of animal life in the shadow of giant protists”. Paleontological research 7 (1): 4354. doi:10.2517/prpsj.7.43. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110002695304/. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Seilacher, A. (1984). “Late Precambrian and Early Cambrian Metazoa: preservational or real extinctions?”. in Holland, H.D.; Trendall, A.F.. Patterns of Change in Earth Evolution. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 159168. ISBN 0387127496. OCLC 11202424.
^ Seilacher, A. (1989). “Vendozoa: organismic construction in the Proterozoic biosphere”. Lethaia 17: 229239. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.1989.tb01332.x.
^ Buss, L.W. and Seilacher, A. (1994). “The Phylum Vendobionta: A Sister Group of the Eumetazoa?”. Paleobiology 20 (1): 14. doi:10.2307/2401145. ISSN 0094-8373. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094-8373%28199424%2920%3A1%3C1%3ATPVASG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Retallack, G.J. (1994). “Were the Ediacaran fossils lichens?”. Paleobiology 20 (4): 523544. ISSN 0094-8373. http://www.uoregon.edu/~gregr/Papers/fossil%20lichens.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Waggoner, B.M. (1995). “Ediacaran Lichens: A Critique”. Paleobiology 21 (3): 393397. doi:10.2307/2401174. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0094-8373(199522)21%3A3%3C393%3AELAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R. Retrieved 2008-02-11.
^ Waggoner, B.; Collins, A.G. (2004). “Reductio Ad Absurdum: Testing The Evolutionary Relationships Of Ediacaran And Paleozoic Problematic Fossils Using Molecular Divergence Dates”. Journal of Paleontology 78 (1): 5161. doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2004)078.
^ Waggoner, Ben (1998). “Interpreting the Earliest Metazoan Fossils: What Can We Learn?” (abstract). Integrative and Comparative Biology 38 (6): 975982. doi:10.1093/icb/38.6.975. http://intl-icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/38/6/975. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
^ Ford, T.D. (1958). “Pre-Cambrian fossils from Charnwood Forest”. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 31: 211217. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2451.1999.00007.x.
^ Zhuralev (1992). “Were Vend-Ediacaran multicellulars metazoa?”. . International Geological Congress, Kyoto, Japan. 2. pp. 339. http://www.jstor.org/view/00948373/di995962/99p0929r/0. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
^ Peterson, K.J. and Waggoner, B. and Hagadorn, J.W. (2003). “A Fungal Analog for Newfoundland Ediacaran Fossils?”. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43 (1): 127136. doi:10.1668/1540-7063(2003)043[0127:AFAFNE]2.0.CO;2.
^ Pflug (1973). “Zur fauna der Nama-Schichten in Sdwest-Afrika. IV. Mikroscopische anatomie der petalo-organisme” (in German). Paleontographica (B144): 166202. ISSN 0375-0299.
^ Schopf, J.W.; Packer, B.M. (1987-07-03). “Early Archean (3.3-billion to 3.5-billion-year-old) microfossils from Warrawoona Group, Australia” (abstract). Science 237 (4810): 70. doi:10.1126/science.11539686. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/237/4810/70. Retrieved 2007-05-21.
^ Hofmann, H.J.; Grey, K.; Hickman, A.H.; Thorpe, R.I. (1999-08-01). “Origin of 3.45 Ga coniform stromatolites in Warrawoona Group, Western Australia” (abstract). Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 111 (8): 12561262. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1256:OOGCSI>2.3.CO;2. http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/111/8/1256. Retrieved 2007-05-21.
^ Archer, C.; Vance, D. (2006-03-01). “Coupled Fe and S isotope evidence for Archean microbial Fe (III) and sulfate reduction” (abstract). Geology 34 (3): 153156. doi:10.1130/G22067.1. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/34/3/153. Retrieved 2007-05-24.
^ Butterfield, Nicholas J. (2000). “Bangiomorpha pubescens n. gen., n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes”. Paleobiology 26: 386. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0386:BPNGNS>2.0.CO;2.
^ Fedonkin, M.A. (1980). “New representatives of the Precambrian coelenterates in the northern Russian platform” (in Russian). Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal: 715. ISSN 0031-031X.
^ Canfield, D.E.; Teske, A. (Jul 1996). “Late Proterozoic rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration inferred from phylogenetic and sulphur-isotope studies” (abstract). Nature 382 (6587): 127132. doi:10.1038/382127a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 11536736. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v382/n6587/abs/382127a0.html. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Canfield, D.E.; Poulton, S.W.; Narbonne, G.M. (2007-01-05). “Late-Neoproterozoic Deep-Ocean Oxygenation and the Rise of Animal Life” (abstract). Science 315 (5808): 92. doi:10.1126/science.1135013. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 17158290. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/315/5808/92. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Fike, DA; Grotzinger, JP, Pratt, LM, Summons, RE (Dec 2006). “Oxidation of the Ediacaran ocean” (abstract). Nature 444 (7120): 7447. doi:10.1038/nature05345. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 17151665. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7120/abs/nature05345.html. Retrieved 2007-04-28.
^ Butterfield, N. (Jan 2009). “Oxygen, animals and oceanic ventilation: an alternative view”. Geobiology 7 (1): 17. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00188.x. ISSN 1472-4677. PMID 19200141. edit
^ Narbonne, Guy M. (September 2003). “Life after Snowball: The Mistaken Point biota and the origin of animal ecosystems”. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Seattle Annual Meeting of the GSA. 35. pp. 516. http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2003AM/finalprogram/abstract_57850.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Shen, B., Dong, L., Xiao, S. and Kowalewski, M. (January 2008). “The Avalon Explosion: Evolution of Ediacara Morphospace” (abstract). Science 319 (5859): 8184. doi:10.1126/science.1150279. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 18174439. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/319/5859/81.
^ Shu, D.-G; Morris, S. Conway; Han, J; Li, Y; Zhang, X.-L; Hua, H; Zhang, Z.-F; Liu, J.-N et al. (2006-05-05). “Lower Cambrian Vendobionts from China and Early Diploblast Evolution” (abstract). Science 312 (5774): 731. doi:10.1126/science.1124565. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16675697. http://science-mag.aaas.org/cgi/content/abstract/312/5774/731. Retrieved 2007-04-28.
^ Gould, S.J.; Calloway, C.B. (1980). “Clams and Brachiopods-Ships that Pass in the Night”. Paleobiology 6 (4): 383396. ISSN 0094-8373.
^ McKerrow, W.S.; Scotese, C.R., Brasier, M.D. (1992). “Early Cambrian continental reconstructions”. Journal of the Geological Society, London 149 (4): 599606. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0599.
^ Hallam, A. (1984). “Pre-Quaternary sea-level changes”. Annual Reviews 12: 205243. doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.12.050184.001225.
^ Brasier, M.D. (1992). “Background to the Cambrian explosion”. Journal of the Geological Society, London 149: 585587. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0585.
^ Brasier, M.D. (1992). “Global ocean-atmosphere change across the Precambrian-Cambrian transition”. Geological Magazine 129 (2): 161168. doi:10.1017/S0016756800008256. ISSN 0016-7568.
^ Lowenstein, T.K.; Timofeeff, M.N.; Brennan, S.T.; Hardie, L.A.; Demicco, R.V. (2001). “Oscillations in Phanerozoic Seawater Chemistry: Evidence from Fluid Inclusions”. Science 294 (5544): 10861089. doi:10.1126/science.1064280. PMID 11691988. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Sci…294.1086L. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Bartley, J.K.; Pope, M., Knoll, A.H., Semikhatov, M.A., Petrov, P.Y.U. (1998). “A Vendian-Cambrian boundary succession from the northwestern margin of the Siberian Platform: stratigraphy, palaeontology, chemostratigraphy and correlation”. Geological Magazine 135 (4): 473494. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.155.6.0957.
^ a b c Erwin, Douglas H (May 2008). “Wonderful Ediacarans, Wonderful Cnidarians?”. Evolution & Development 10 (3): 263264. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00234.x. ISSN 1520-541X. PMID 18460087.
^ Benus (1988). “Trace fossils, small shelly fossils and the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary”. New York State Museum Bulletin. 463. University of the State of New York (May 1988). pp. 81. ISBN 978-1555571788.
^ Clapham, Matthew E.; Narbonne, Guy M., Gehling, James G. (2003). [= http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/4/527 “Paleoecology of the oldest known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland”] (abstract). Paleobiology 29 (4): 527544. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2003)029<0527:POTOKA>2.0.CO;2. = http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/29/4/527. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Clapham, M.E.; Narbonne, G.M. (2002). “Ediacaran epifaunal tiering” (abstract). Geology 30 (7): 627630. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0627:EET>2.0.CO;2. http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/7/627.
^ a b c d e f Grazhdankin, Dima (2004). “Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: facies versus biogeography and evolution” (PDF). Palobiology 30 (2): 203221. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0203:PODITE>2.0.CO;2. http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/reprint/30/2/203.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-08. (Source of data for Timeline synthesis, p218. Further citations available in caption to Fig. 8.)
^ Narbonne, Guy M. (2005). “The Ediacara Biota: Neoproterozoic Origin of Animals and Their Ecosystems”. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33: 421442. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122519. http://geol.queensu.ca/people/narbonne/NarbonneAREPS2005Final.pdf. Retrieved 200-901-03.
^ Waggoner, B. (1999). “Biogeographic Analyses of the Ediacara Biota: A Conflict with Paleotectonic Reconstructions” (abstract). Paleobiology 25 (4): 440458. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(1999)025<0440:BAOTEB>2.3.CO;2. http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/4/440. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
^ Bambach, R.K.; Bush, A.M., Erwin, D.H. (2007). “Autecology and the filling of Ecospace: Key metazoan radiations”. Palontology 50 (1): 122. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00611.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00611.x. Retrieved 2007-03-08.
Further reading
Mark McMenamin (1998). The Garden of Ediacara: Discovering the First Complex Life. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 368pp. ISBN 0231105584. OCLC 37588521 60159576. An outdated popular science account of these fossils, with a narrowed focus on only the Namibian Fossils.
Derek Briggs & Peter Crowther (Editors) (2001). Palobiology II: A synthesis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science. pp. Chapter 1. ISBN 0-632-05147-7. OCLC 43945263 51682981. Excellent further reading for the keen – includes many interesting chapters with macroevolutionary theme.
External links
Listen to this article (info/dl)
This audio file was created from a revision dated 2009-08-29, and does not reflect subsequent edits to the article. (Audio help)
More spoken articles
Melvin Bragg, with Richard Corfield, Martin Brasier and Rachel Wood (2009-07-09). “In Our Time: The Ediacara Biota”. BBC Radio 4. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/inourtime.shtml. Retrieved 2009-08-29.
“The oldest complex animal fossils” Queens’ University, Canada
“Ediacaran fossils of Canada” Queens’ University, Canada
“The Ediacaran Assemblage” Thorough, though slightly out-of-date, description
Categories: Geology | Paleontology | Fossils | Ediacaran biotaHidden categories: Featured articles | Spoken articles
I am an expert from China Quality Dress, usually analyzes all kind of industries situation, such as knotty alder door , fiberglass reinforced plastic panels.
Processing your request, Please wait....
