International Competitiveness of China ranked second
School of Economics, Fudan University (China) International competitive research base, game theory, Fudan University, Quantitative Economics Research Center Task Force issued the 2010-2011 World countries (and regions) Assessment of International Competitiveness Ranking “report, the United States, China, Canada breakdown of the first three. According to the research group introduced the report select the 75 major countries and regions, according to the composite index consisting of four aspects of intrinsic motivation, condition factors, environmental factors and economic performance in international competitiveness rankings.
The School of Economics, Fudan University announced the global competitiveness ranking report is the second time, since the hospital 2010 One bright spot is that China will continue to sit in the ranking of number two. The face of global economic recession, coupled with the decline of the Chinese real estate, manufacturing and export trade, many people worry that China’s competitiveness will be dropped, but the report still ranks second in China’s international competitiveness.
Common sense, to hear the international competitiveness of China’s “one of the best”, we should be excited about. As a developing country, China’s international competitiveness from the past are usually ranked between 20-30, and now all of a sudden leapt to second place. Unfortunately, we looked at, but how also not be happy, because how we did not feel that China has more than the international competitiveness of Japan, Germany, France and other developed countries.
Last year, the School of Economics released the first international competitiveness assessment ranking report to the Chinese as a second, which has caused the printing of the questioning. The group later explained that the ranking of “international competitiveness” clearly defined for the macro-economic international competitiveness as the core of the development potential of economic growth, instead of the current economic strength, the level of development, is not the microeconomic competitiveness of enterprises, competitiveness in international trade. In short, the ratio of the potential.
This explanation could convince you, may place a question mark. September 7, 2011, the organizers of the meeting of the world financial community leaders summit in Davos – World Economic Forum published the World Competitiveness Report “, China is ranked 26 (in 2010 China ranked 27 bit, ranked 29 in 2009), with a score of 4.90 points. Ranked first in the country is Switzerland, with a score of 5.74; second in Singapore, scoring 5.63 points; third in Sweden, with a score of 5.61 points.
People will ask, why the School of Economics report – China is ranked 2, while the report of the World Economic Forum “- China is ranked 26. The difference between the two is so large, the letter who.
Some analysts believe that this happens, the main concern of the School of Economics, Fudan University. It selected 75 major countries and regions, according to the composite index of four aspects of intrinsic motivation, condition factors, environmental factors and economic performance, international competitiveness rankings. Extract indicators of the hospital has many limitations, the international competitiveness of its published ranking being questioned is to be expected.
And other international institutions are more concerned about the country was included in the survey have the ability to fight against adversity. For example, the International Institute for Management in Lausanne, Switzerland in 2011 for the first time for the assessment of the economy to increase competitive pressure test items, test deteriorating economic environment, the economies ability to confront adversity.
In fact, a lot of global competitiveness report, assess the content of these reports emphasize the holistic and forward-looking. Like the United States, Western Europe and Nordic countries, as well as small economies such as Hong Kong, Singapore and other countries and international competitiveness rankings, more forward. Although China’s economic performance, in particular, economic forecasts and prospects ranked first in the world, but China is still a problem in the growth rate continued.
First of all, China’s economic development foundation, there are many bottlenecks, such as in science and technology, IT, engineering, finance and economics education and population issues at the back. Secondly, the Chinese enterprise management level, such as the efficiency of large enterprises, the shortage of managers, the ability to adapt to changes in the market so there is a problem. In addition, China’s financial system, the environmental factors, government and corporate regulatory deficiencies. It is because of the presence of these factors had a negative impact on China’s international competitiveness.
Looking back, the School of Economics, Fudan University, 2010-2011, the world’s major countries (and regions) Assessment of International Competitiveness Ranking report is released, in addition to the domestic part of the media reports, the foreign mainstream media is almost silent visible its influence is very limited.
Further inference, not recognized by the international community to the international competitiveness rankings, at best, entertain. In fact, China is an emerging economy, international competitiveness, compared with developed economies, there is a great gap. To really get on the international competitiveness of the world’s number two, there is still a long way to go. This involves many deep-seated problems, is not able to solve overnight.
Processing your request, Please wait....
