The Dispute Between Evolution Vs Creationism
Theories in how mankind evolve continues to be a sensitive and tricky subject particularly when it pertains to religion. Evolution vs creationism has created a debate about the conflicting ideas between religion and scientific explanations. Science have gathered enough facts and theories in proving that man is a result of evolution but creationism based its theories on a belief that God created mankind. Religion is strongly believed by many while evolution is supported by the minority. Evolution as well as its theories is extremely opposite and contradicts all the teachings from the Bible and the theory of evolution is definitely a challenge to prove by scientists.
With facts or information at hand, man chooses to believe what they think is right for them between evolution vs creationism. Even if all scientists were able to produce some facts in regards to evolution of man, Christians and other religion still chose to continue to their beliefs that man exist in earth because they were created by higher power. Individuals living in United States and other countries will not likely accept the evolution theory as supported by Charles Darwin since the inconceivable relationship between man and apes are not that approved. Studies on Evolution and Creationism suggest that the major influence for the idea in creationism is the influence of church and religion and not on the understanding of science.
The theory of evolution is rejected by Americans however there are individuals that are skeptical about this theory. In United States, Ron Paul is increasing in its popularity since his vision towards uncontrolled freedom from your government. He has several controversial theories like the Ron Paul on Evolution, racism and even homosexuality. Ron Paul on Evolution strongly reflects on his rejection of the scientific facts of evolution. Ron Paul on Evolution strongly emphasizes the belief that evolution is only a theory that should not be accepted. This greatly reflects his religious favors which strongly appears that he didn’t study any deeper but only his religious beliefs. However, many are concerned about his views on origin since it does not mean that if you accept the theories of evolution, you will turn away from the assumption in God. People should know better and they know who to vote for the right candidate to represent his country.
The evolution vs creationism question has long been settled by science. Unfortunately in the United States, it is still considered to be a legitimate debate for a large segment of the population, and this has created room for evolution-denying politicians. A perfect example the Ron Paul evolution stance, which is not unique. Many politicians (mostly Republican) take a similar view.
Processing your request, Please wait....
