Matthew Bridges Sales Manager Barkmate

Before we start, it should be made clear that this is not just another reactionary topical argument by a person/company who has no working experience with the products showcased. In mid-2010, after five-years of being one of Australia’s top sellers of noise correction collars, we made the decision to no more sell or assist ‘shock collars’. We believe that we have made the right decision, according to various factors that individuals would like to share with you;

To start with, we believe that static correction collars are generally an extremely effective way of controlling an undesired behaviour in really stubborn dogs, any time used properly and with proper training. However, your ‘used properly and with proper training’ part is regretfully neglected as masters pursue a quick fix choice with little to no follow-up.

As well as in situations of correct usage and training, we are not confident that the static correction training collar is the right alternative in the majority of cases. To draw a simultaneous, it’s like taking prescribed migraine tablets to deal with a small headache – it’s just not necessary, and even wise, as a 1st line of defense. Surprise collars are increasingly being applied to dogs that just don’t need them.

Personally, we now have always recommended starting with other methods of static correction before using a fixed correction collar, yet we now felt it was time to put our funds where our oral cavity is and stay completely by these other forms of modification in place of Shock Collar.

As dog lovers most of all, our priority offers safe and humane products to solve canine problems and promoting shock collars was the one area exactly where we felt that we could not 100% adhere to this kind of self-imposed code.

Shock collars for dogs cause pain. There’s no dressing up it up or transferring it off as something else. To say it is like the shocks we get from the carpet, car or possibly a battery is downplaying this to a misleading level. Whether they put out a smaller amount power than a home battery is irrelevant – the proof is within the use and the impulse. The pain may only work for a fraction of a 2nd, and your dog may possibly learn very quickly from it, but it’s still a very unpleasant sensation. At times it’s absolutely necessary when all the options have failed, and that’s fine. But way too many are prescribing and/or using shock collars since the first and only option in addressing the behavioural problem. Promoting shock collars because the ‘best option’ is a dangerously inaccurate sales tactic, since it does not take into account one of the variables that make up just what complex decision.

The effectiveness rating regarding shock collars can be advertised as anywhere from 95-99%, depending on who you question, and those figures are pretty accurate. Nonetheless, what’s not stated is only 5% of all pet dogs should even should get to the stage where a shock collar is absolutely necessary. Spray correction dog collars and vibration correction collars combined can and do lessen nuisance barking inside large majority of dogs, and without the unpleasant aspects of shock collars.

Some retailers perhaps tout that fixed shock collars hold the lowest rate regarding return. But simply what does that have to do with both you and your dog and, moreover, your dog’s welfare? The lowest rate of return is great for a business owner, as it means they retain their particular profit margin through the initial sale. We might sell 100 jolt collars to A hundred dog owners and only get 1 return, as the products did their job in 99 of the cases. Nevertheless out of those Ninety nine cases, we can state that only a modest handful would totally have needed a surprise collar to treat their problem.

In 2010, many of us performed a comprehensive review study into apply correction collars as well as the results showed that 81% of participants had positive results over the training time period. Later in 2011, produce your own . to perform a similar research with vibration static correction collars, so that we are able to back up the boasts that we already know are generally fairly accurate.

In the event the survey study will be released in May possibly 2011, we will dismiss most of the myths with regards to spray collars, such as the idea that certain breeds, ages or sizes are immune to their own effects.

In an ideal world, shock dog collars would only comprise 5% of our overall organization, because people would have utilized other methods very first and trained their own dog correctly while using products before relying on static correction devices.

We’re not activists who are ranting and raving over products that we have no real world experience with. Our own position comes from lengthy use and knowledge about shock collars over the years. And there is very little to gain from dropping support of shock training collars, because we are effectively turning away over 60% of our existing enterprise.

Now, are we versus static correction instruction as a whole? No. Doing work dogs and looking dogs get amazing features from remote control noise correction training, vital to the tasks that they can perform in their day-to-day life. But these dogs comprise only a small fraction regarding Australia’s dog population, which are primarily domestic pets. For non-bark control related education of domestic pets, the spray or vibration trainer will even now do the job in most cases.

Likewise, static correction may be the only form of correction we would recommend for implementing an invisible dog containment kennel area. Containing an escape performer dog goes from being a nuisance difficulty to a life-threatening problem, consequently a much stronger correction is required to train your new puppy to know its boundaries. But it should not be the only kind of fencing, because we’ve got witnessed first-hand several events where a containment fence has failed.

So, where do we stand along with what are our suggestions in the ongoing shock collar debate?
To begin with, we believe that static correction anti sound off collars should be accessible to purchase by prescribed only after asking a practicing veterinary or qualified and professional trainer which includes no financial fascination with the product through offering them directly as well as by affiliation. Substantiation that all other techniques have been exhausted needs to be required before such a prescription is issued.

Out of the box the case with gun and other hunting/farming equipment, we presume a permit needs to be required to use a static correction remote control coach for hunting, operating and law enforcement canines. And, in cases where evidence can be provided that other methods have failed, pertaining to domestic pets.

For containment purposes, we believe there should be no constraints on static static correction hidden fences, providing that traditional fencing has either failed or perhaps is not an option in the location. Professional installation and introduction coaching should be mandatory.

It’s not a position that will make people popular with suppliers or perhaps competitors, but it is an informed and researched decision nonetheless. If you love your furry friend and you’re prepared to spend money to address a problem, as opposed to abandoning the animal or perhaps ignoring the conduct, then we urge you to make the socially accountable decision to only try static shock merchandise as an absolute final line of defense.

We’re going to continue to honour extended auto warranties and guarantees upon static training merchandise we have sold in yesteryear, but we will no longer be offering new static correction products available.
Thanks for taking the time to read this.

For more information about Shock Collar visit our website.

Processing your request, Please wait....